Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The Fundamental Flaw with the Revised DCs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RigaMortus2" data-source="post: 4391037" data-attributes="member: 11586"><p>See, I would have went about Skill Challenges in a slightly different manner...</p><p></p><p>First, I'm not sure I would have classified them as easy, moderate, or hard challenges. The first one doesn't really make any sense. If it is supposed to be a challenge, then it wouldn't be easy, would it? Still, I like the idea behind it. You need to get X successes before Y failures. What the DM is inflating is how long it will take you to complete the challenge.</p><p></p><p>Second, I would let the player make the choice on how he wants to try and win the challenge (with an easy, moderate or hard skill check). A player can choose not to participate, but it would be in their best interest to at least HELP by making some sort of skill check. This is where my idea differs from how 4e does it...</p><p></p><p>Player chooses an Easy skill check.</p><p>Success means he can choose a player to get +2 to their next skill roll, but this doesn't count as a "success" for the skill challenge.</p><p>There is no consequence for failure when failing on an easy skill check.</p><p></p><p>Player chooses a Moderate skill check.</p><p>Success means you gain 1 success towards completing the skill challenge.</p><p>Failure means you gain 1 failure towards the skill challenge.</p><p></p><p>Player chooses a Hard skill check.</p><p>Success means you gain 1 success towards completing the skill challenge, and a player of your choice gains +2 on their next skill check.</p><p>Failure means you gain 1 failure towards the skill challenge, and the next player that makes a moderate or hard skill check for this skill challenge gets a -2 to their attempt (assume that whatever the player did somehow screws up the next player's try, perhaps incorrect information was given, the wrong wire on a trap was cut, etc.).</p><p></p><p>Anyway, just my quick thoughts on the subject <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RigaMortus2, post: 4391037, member: 11586"] See, I would have went about Skill Challenges in a slightly different manner... First, I'm not sure I would have classified them as easy, moderate, or hard challenges. The first one doesn't really make any sense. If it is supposed to be a challenge, then it wouldn't be easy, would it? Still, I like the idea behind it. You need to get X successes before Y failures. What the DM is inflating is how long it will take you to complete the challenge. Second, I would let the player make the choice on how he wants to try and win the challenge (with an easy, moderate or hard skill check). A player can choose not to participate, but it would be in their best interest to at least HELP by making some sort of skill check. This is where my idea differs from how 4e does it... Player chooses an Easy skill check. Success means he can choose a player to get +2 to their next skill roll, but this doesn't count as a "success" for the skill challenge. There is no consequence for failure when failing on an easy skill check. Player chooses a Moderate skill check. Success means you gain 1 success towards completing the skill challenge. Failure means you gain 1 failure towards the skill challenge. Player chooses a Hard skill check. Success means you gain 1 success towards completing the skill challenge, and a player of your choice gains +2 on their next skill check. Failure means you gain 1 failure towards the skill challenge, and the next player that makes a moderate or hard skill check for this skill challenge gets a -2 to their attempt (assume that whatever the player did somehow screws up the next player's try, perhaps incorrect information was given, the wrong wire on a trap was cut, etc.). Anyway, just my quick thoughts on the subject :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The Fundamental Flaw with the Revised DCs
Top