Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="AFGNCAAP" data-source="post: 3202934" data-attributes="member: 871">To refer/respond back to the OP:Interesting idea.&nbsp; However, I originally thought the RAW stated that there was a special modification regarding the one-step rule for St. Cuthbert &amp; Wee Jas: only positive energy channeling/LG &amp; LN for St. Cuthbert, &amp; only negative energy channeling/LN &amp; LE for Wee Jas.Well, the bit with St. Cuthbert's on target, though the only thing about Wee Jas is that her neutral clerics can only channel negative energy (and can't choose to channel positive energy instead) (PHB, p. 53).&nbsp; Didn't see anything on AL restrictions for Wee Jas.&nbsp; However, with the stuff from the PHB, I get the feeling that any LG sect of Wee Jas is few &amp; far between (while the more evil-inclined sect is dominating the faith).Then again, I kinda get the feeling that the paladin of Wee Jas-related PrC is a way to have a FR Kelemvor-following paladin in a Greyhawk setting.&nbsp; Not sure if it works, IMHO.Of course, there's always the Rule 0/IMC exception; I'd say it's just simpler to go that route rather than try to find canonical support (or OTOH, find a lack of canonical support against your choice).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="AFGNCAAP, post: 3202934, member: 871"] To refer/respond back to the OP: Interesting idea. However, I originally thought the RAW stated that there was a special modification regarding the one-step rule for St. Cuthbert & Wee Jas: only positive energy channeling/LG & LN for St. Cuthbert, & only negative energy channeling/LN & LE for Wee Jas. Well, the bit with St. Cuthbert's on target, though the only thing about Wee Jas is that her neutral clerics can only channel negative energy (and can't choose to channel positive energy instead) (PHB, p. 53). Didn't see anything on AL restrictions for Wee Jas. However, with the stuff from the PHB, I get the feeling that any LG sect of Wee Jas is few & far between (while the more evil-inclined sect is dominating the faith). Then again, I kinda get the feeling that the paladin of Wee Jas-related PrC is a way to have a FR Kelemvor-following paladin in a Greyhawk setting. Not sure if it works, IMHO. Of course, there's always the Rule 0/IMC exception; I'd say it's just simpler to go that route rather than try to find canonical support (or OTOH, find a lack of canonical support [I]against[/I] your choice). [/QUOTE]

Verification