Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
"The Future of D&D is International" (Inverse article)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mercurius" data-source="post: 7636850" data-attributes="member: 59082"><p>OK, fair enough. I shouldn't have said it wasn't at all interesting or implied that either of you are guilty of BadWrongInterest, but I was irked in that it is the only quasi-controversial thing in the article, and of course it happens to be the center of discussion. I was concerned that it would be yet another opportunity for people to be offended, feel entitled and/or mis-treated by WotC for not catering to their special needs...thankfully that hasn't really happened in this thread.</p><p></p><p>Anyhow, I too find it somewhat interesting, but more for the underlying implications - that is, <em>why </em>is their approach so successful? Why is an "old-fashioned" game of books, dice, and imagination so popular in a world of immersive video games and virtual realities? What are people craving for and enjoying that the cyber milieu isn't offering? </p><p></p><p>What WotC is doing is wildly successful. Would also selling PDFs make D&D even more successful? I don't know, but presumably WotC has made the researched guess that in fact no, it wouldn't - otherwise they'd be doing it. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Except...no, not really. D&D is proving that the "latest and greatest" technology isn't always the best, or what people want. What the article is saying contradicts your Darwinian thinking: the book was <em>not </em>killed, but has survived and is thriving. People want the tactile experience of books, pencils and paper, dice and miniatures; they want the theater of mind, not another simulative screen. They want the in-person social interaction with actual other, real human beings - not just text interactions with avatars.</p><p></p><p>Books aren't going away, just as watercolor paints aren't being eradicated by digital art or wooden violins by 3D printers or synthesizers. They are classical cultural artifacts that have lasting perennial value and meaning to the human experience. </p><p></p><p>I would also add that board games are in a bit of a golden era, for the last decade or more. While the board game experience is not nearly as immersive or imaginative as RPGs, it does share one thing in common: hanging out in the real world with actual real human beings.</p><p></p><p>If I sound like an unabashed member of <em>Team Meatspace! </em>then guilty as charged. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't disagree with this, but they've done this with games like <em>Wrath of Ashardalon</em> with (at best) tepid results. As I mentioned elsewhere, I recently played <em>Wrath</em> with my two daughters and was greatly disappointed: it was like D&D but with the best elements taken out. No imagination, no real story - and very repetitive. We actually preferred the much simpler <em>Dungeon </em>game.</p><p></p><p>But certainly a board game that whets the appetite for more would be nice, but I don't think they've come across the right combination of simple and playable in a few hours, but also with enough of the story and imagination of D&D to give a taste of the actual game. To me that would be the Holy Grail of a D&D boardgame: you get a taste of what makes D&D really special: the feeling that you're participating in a story in a living, imaginary world.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mercurius, post: 7636850, member: 59082"] OK, fair enough. I shouldn't have said it wasn't at all interesting or implied that either of you are guilty of BadWrongInterest, but I was irked in that it is the only quasi-controversial thing in the article, and of course it happens to be the center of discussion. I was concerned that it would be yet another opportunity for people to be offended, feel entitled and/or mis-treated by WotC for not catering to their special needs...thankfully that hasn't really happened in this thread. Anyhow, I too find it somewhat interesting, but more for the underlying implications - that is, [I]why [/I]is their approach so successful? Why is an "old-fashioned" game of books, dice, and imagination so popular in a world of immersive video games and virtual realities? What are people craving for and enjoying that the cyber milieu isn't offering? What WotC is doing is wildly successful. Would also selling PDFs make D&D even more successful? I don't know, but presumably WotC has made the researched guess that in fact no, it wouldn't - otherwise they'd be doing it. Except...no, not really. D&D is proving that the "latest and greatest" technology isn't always the best, or what people want. What the article is saying contradicts your Darwinian thinking: the book was [I]not [/I]killed, but has survived and is thriving. People want the tactile experience of books, pencils and paper, dice and miniatures; they want the theater of mind, not another simulative screen. They want the in-person social interaction with actual other, real human beings - not just text interactions with avatars. Books aren't going away, just as watercolor paints aren't being eradicated by digital art or wooden violins by 3D printers or synthesizers. They are classical cultural artifacts that have lasting perennial value and meaning to the human experience. I would also add that board games are in a bit of a golden era, for the last decade or more. While the board game experience is not nearly as immersive or imaginative as RPGs, it does share one thing in common: hanging out in the real world with actual real human beings. If I sound like an unabashed member of [I]Team Meatspace! [/I]then guilty as charged. I don't disagree with this, but they've done this with games like [I]Wrath of Ashardalon[/I] with (at best) tepid results. As I mentioned elsewhere, I recently played [I]Wrath[/I] with my two daughters and was greatly disappointed: it was like D&D but with the best elements taken out. No imagination, no real story - and very repetitive. We actually preferred the much simpler [I]Dungeon [/I]game. But certainly a board game that whets the appetite for more would be nice, but I don't think they've come across the right combination of simple and playable in a few hours, but also with enough of the story and imagination of D&D to give a taste of the actual game. To me that would be the Holy Grail of a D&D boardgame: you get a taste of what makes D&D really special: the feeling that you're participating in a story in a living, imaginary world. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
"The Future of D&D is International" (Inverse article)
Top