Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Amrûnril" data-source="post: 8409460" data-attributes="member: 6841183">My preference would actually be for keeping both the Champion and the Battlemaster. One provides a simple fighter experience, while the other gives the player tools to build a broad range of more complex fighters. And both are relatively flexible in their flavor. This strikes me as a good approach to making sure the most important bases are covered, before branching out to more unique, narrowly tailored options in extended rule books.I do think the balance of the Champion needs to be adjusted, though. Critting on a 19 does nothing for 95% of attack rolls, and seems pretty clearly inferior, power-wise*, to any other fighter subclass's level 3 bonus.*outside the context of multiclasses designed around crit mechanics, which aren't relevant to a player looking far a simple fighter </blockquote>