Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Cergorach" data-source="post: 1723291" data-attributes="member: 725">That's probably due to the fact that fantasy seems to be more popular in rpg world then sci-fi. D20 fantasy is 'over supported', i see that as a good thing. There's currently something going on that i can only describe as &quot;culling the herd&quot;, there's so much stuff out there that it's bound to contain gems, people are finding the gems and the gravel is being discarded (going out of business).I think that WotC was expecting more of the sci-fi/modern rpgers to start using D20 Modern, but if the main pusher is rather sparse with support i doubt others will pick up where WotC stopped. Especially when it's more profitable (and easier) to service the D20 users (instead of the D20 Modern users).Personally i found Spycraft more to my liking then D20 Modern (as a rules set), but with more support comming from WotC maybe we'll get some additional interesting stuff (settings) for D20 Modern...</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Cergorach, post: 1723291, member: 725"] That's probably due to the fact that fantasy seems to be more popular in rpg world then sci-fi. D20 fantasy is 'over supported', i see that as a good thing. There's currently something going on that i can only describe as "culling the herd", there's so much stuff out there that it's bound to contain gems, people are finding the gems and the gravel is being discarded (going out of business). I think that WotC was expecting more of the sci-fi/modern rpgers to start using D20 Modern, but if the main pusher is rather sparse with support i doubt others will pick up where WotC stopped. Especially when it's more profitable (and easier) to service the D20 users (instead of the D20 Modern users). Personally i found Spycraft more to my liking then D20 Modern (as a rules set), but with more support comming from WotC maybe we'll get some additional interesting stuff (settings) for D20 Modern... [/QUOTE]

Verification