Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="UngainlyTitan" data-source="post: 8634247" data-attributes="member: 28487">Here we run into the nomenclature of &quot;differences of small changes&quot;. I do not regard changes like new version of the monster or even stuff like the Tasha changes for the ranger as invalidating older content. You can build a Hunter Ranger in my game and even replace Primeval Awareness and keep Favoured Enemy, if you want.I am quite willing to use a Monster Manual Archmage with full slot progression and spells along side a magic user from the newer books with a multiuse Ranged/Melee Spell attack and a more limited spell list and no spell slots. I do not regard that as a change of any significance. As for lore, I have never been bothered by lore over the last 40 years so why should I start now. I also regard the controversies here as a storm in a teacup. It is a relatively small number of people with some particular issues. I am not denigrating those issues, they are important to those people to varying degrees. Some will move on and keep their version of the game going, other will play the new version and more will accept some changes, forbid other and houserule some as well. As was ever done. In the grand scheme of things, ENWorld forum users in their entirety are not worth WoTC marketing getting out of bed in the morning.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="UngainlyTitan, post: 8634247, member: 28487"] Here we run into the nomenclature of "differences of small changes". I do not regard changes like new version of the monster or even stuff like the Tasha changes for the ranger as invalidating older content. You can build a Hunter Ranger in my game and even replace Primeval Awareness and keep Favoured Enemy, if you want. I am quite willing to use a Monster Manual Archmage with full slot progression and spells along side a magic user from the newer books with a multiuse Ranged/Melee Spell attack and a more limited spell list and no spell slots. I do not regard that as a change of any significance. As for lore, I have never been bothered by lore over the last 40 years so why should I start now. I also regard the controversies here as a storm in a teacup. It is a relatively small number of people with some particular issues. I am not denigrating those issues, they are important to those people to varying degrees. Some will move on and keep their version of the game going, other will play the new version and more will accept some changes, forbid other and houserule some as well. As was ever done. In the grand scheme of things, ENWorld forum users in their entirety are not worth WoTC marketing getting out of bed in the morning. [/QUOTE]

Verification