Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Future of the Ranger
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mephista" data-source="post: 7251319" data-attributes="member: 6786252"><p>The PHB beastmaster lets you make an attack at the same time as your pet if you have the Extra Attack feature. Now, its true that this technically not an attack action, and will have some odd interactions with some other rules, but realistically? Its little different than the ranger giving up one of their attacks and giving it to the pet. </p><p></p><p>I suppose if you want to be technical, since its not an attack action, you can't TWF or use Swift Quiver and other things to make a bonus action attack either, but that's where I'd just make the ruling that you can, because otherwise it's counter-intuitive to me. </p><p></p><p>Even in this case, however there were issues. People didn't like giving up their attacks to deal less damage through a pet. Or one that could die so easily. The inability to apply Hunter's Mark damage hurt as well. The list goes on, but I think it effectively came down to the feeling that the pet was diminishing the Ranger's abilities rather than complementing them, and the ranger would be more effective in both exploration and combat without the pet.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mephista, post: 7251319, member: 6786252"] The PHB beastmaster lets you make an attack at the same time as your pet if you have the Extra Attack feature. Now, its true that this technically not an attack action, and will have some odd interactions with some other rules, but realistically? Its little different than the ranger giving up one of their attacks and giving it to the pet. I suppose if you want to be technical, since its not an attack action, you can't TWF or use Swift Quiver and other things to make a bonus action attack either, but that's where I'd just make the ruling that you can, because otherwise it's counter-intuitive to me. Even in this case, however there were issues. People didn't like giving up their attacks to deal less damage through a pet. Or one that could die so easily. The inability to apply Hunter's Mark damage hurt as well. The list goes on, but I think it effectively came down to the feeling that the pet was diminishing the Ranger's abilities rather than complementing them, and the ranger would be more effective in both exploration and combat without the pet. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Future of the Ranger
Top