Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Lanefan" data-source="post: 8876975" data-attributes="member: 29398">That brings up an even more egregious eample of nonsensical rulings: that a caster in the middle of casting one spell can self-interrupt and stop, cast a second different spell, then resume casting the first one to its completion.This flies in the face of the concept that an interrupted spell is lost e.g. if the caster gets hit in the face during casting and fails to maintain the casting process (which failure IMO should be automatic, but that's another issue).  Here the caster is not just interrupting himself but is doing so in order to cast another spell, so how on earth can the process of casting the first one be maintained?</blockquote>