Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The Great D&D Schism: The End of an age and the scattering of gamers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Desdichado" data-source="post: 6253029" data-attributes="member: 2205"><p>Are you suggesting that there aren't people out there already deciding whether or not to play D&DN based on the information that's available right now?</p><p></p><p>Balesir makes a great point. Some people, (my wife for instance) are easily paralyzed by too many options. She has the feeling that if she hasn't thoroughly evaluated every option, then how can she make an informed decision and not feel buyer's remorse for her selection? In her case, opening up a wide-open field of options is not a good thing. She fits the mold of exactly the kind of person that the study referred to above is talking about.</p><p></p><p>Me, on the other hand, I'm a much more decisive personality in general. I'm ready to leap into action and consider a decision made based on a quick and dirty executive summary of a handful of options that are immediately in front of me, and I rarely look back and question my decisions already made unless 1) it's obviously not working out and a new decision needs to be made, or 2) new information becomes available to me that I didn't know when I made the prior decision.</p><p></p><p>For personalities like mine, that study is complete nonsense. I don't feel the need to research every option available; I'm perfectly happy making a decision based on the options that are immediately in front of me <em>only</em>. Plus, making decisions is easy, and not based on painstaking research ahead of time. Plus, I can evaluate almost subconsciously how much I'm going to like a given option ahead of time quite easily, so I feel confident in my decisions, even without lots of research. For me, having lots of options is empowering, not paralyzing.</p><p></p><p>I'm sure that the range of human responses is a wide spectrum between those two relatively extreme positions (not that I wife and I are truly on polar opposites of this spectrum; rather than she trends one way and I trend the other).</p><p></p><p>But by and large, having more options is <em>always</em> better. I've never heard anyone complain before that they have too many options of shows to watch on TV and therefore are paralyzed by indecision and don't watch anything. Same thing with books to read, video games to play, or vacations to take. I don't know why role-playing games would be any different in this regard than any other form of leisure time pursuit.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Desdichado, post: 6253029, member: 2205"] Are you suggesting that there aren't people out there already deciding whether or not to play D&DN based on the information that's available right now? Balesir makes a great point. Some people, (my wife for instance) are easily paralyzed by too many options. She has the feeling that if she hasn't thoroughly evaluated every option, then how can she make an informed decision and not feel buyer's remorse for her selection? In her case, opening up a wide-open field of options is not a good thing. She fits the mold of exactly the kind of person that the study referred to above is talking about. Me, on the other hand, I'm a much more decisive personality in general. I'm ready to leap into action and consider a decision made based on a quick and dirty executive summary of a handful of options that are immediately in front of me, and I rarely look back and question my decisions already made unless 1) it's obviously not working out and a new decision needs to be made, or 2) new information becomes available to me that I didn't know when I made the prior decision. For personalities like mine, that study is complete nonsense. I don't feel the need to research every option available; I'm perfectly happy making a decision based on the options that are immediately in front of me [I]only[/I]. Plus, making decisions is easy, and not based on painstaking research ahead of time. Plus, I can evaluate almost subconsciously how much I'm going to like a given option ahead of time quite easily, so I feel confident in my decisions, even without lots of research. For me, having lots of options is empowering, not paralyzing. I'm sure that the range of human responses is a wide spectrum between those two relatively extreme positions (not that I wife and I are truly on polar opposites of this spectrum; rather than she trends one way and I trend the other). But by and large, having more options is [I]always[/I] better. I've never heard anyone complain before that they have too many options of shows to watch on TV and therefore are paralyzed by indecision and don't watch anything. Same thing with books to read, video games to play, or vacations to take. I don't know why role-playing games would be any different in this regard than any other form of leisure time pursuit. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The Great D&D Schism: The End of an age and the scattering of gamers
Top