Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Great Railroad Thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="hawkeyefan" data-source="post: 9735535" data-attributes="member: 6785785"><p>In my experience, it means where the goals of play are chosen by the players. Or if there’s a goal of play determined by the premise of the game, then it's broad enough to allow players to choose how to achieve that goal. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think that notion is mistaken. I think that sandbox play can indeed be subject to GM force. Honestly, in a way it may be worse because it’s less obvious… so players may think their choices matter more than they do. </p><p></p><p>Most sandboxes still rely on heavy GM prep. The focus of play is often still going to be the material the GM has created. So while this material may not be presented in a linear manner, it’s still largely pre-determined. It’s more like a menu of GM material, and the players choose what they’d to engage with. There may be some more freedom within this structure than in a linear adventure, but it’s not really any less susceptible to GM force. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, the beginning is there to get things started. I’m fine with a module that just starts off with a situation that demands attention. Why beat around the bush? </p><p></p><p>Then, as you say, it opens up quite a bit in the middle. I think this is why the module is highly regarded. It gives the GM enough guidance to handle the material, but doesn’t dictate how the players must engage with it. </p><p></p><p>Again, compare the reaction to this module to that of the <em>Tyranny of Dragons </em>books and I think the distinction is obvious. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That’s fine! I don’t know if that’s quite what was being said. However, as I just said above, I don’t think that “sandbox” play is automatically a better option, or somehow exempt from GM force. </p><p></p><p>I think the only way you can have a game where GM force becomes obvious is one where the players truly are free to declare what they want to do and how they want to do it. If that’s the expectation, and if the game functions that way, it becomes incredibly obvious when the GM tries to force anything.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="hawkeyefan, post: 9735535, member: 6785785"] In my experience, it means where the goals of play are chosen by the players. Or if there’s a goal of play determined by the premise of the game, then it's broad enough to allow players to choose how to achieve that goal. I think that notion is mistaken. I think that sandbox play can indeed be subject to GM force. Honestly, in a way it may be worse because it’s less obvious… so players may think their choices matter more than they do. Most sandboxes still rely on heavy GM prep. The focus of play is often still going to be the material the GM has created. So while this material may not be presented in a linear manner, it’s still largely pre-determined. It’s more like a menu of GM material, and the players choose what they’d to engage with. There may be some more freedom within this structure than in a linear adventure, but it’s not really any less susceptible to GM force. Well, the beginning is there to get things started. I’m fine with a module that just starts off with a situation that demands attention. Why beat around the bush? Then, as you say, it opens up quite a bit in the middle. I think this is why the module is highly regarded. It gives the GM enough guidance to handle the material, but doesn’t dictate how the players must engage with it. Again, compare the reaction to this module to that of the [I]Tyranny of Dragons [/I]books and I think the distinction is obvious. That’s fine! I don’t know if that’s quite what was being said. However, as I just said above, I don’t think that “sandbox” play is automatically a better option, or somehow exempt from GM force. I think the only way you can have a game where GM force becomes obvious is one where the players truly are free to declare what they want to do and how they want to do it. If that’s the expectation, and if the game functions that way, it becomes incredibly obvious when the GM tries to force anything. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Great Railroad Thread
Top