Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
The Guards at the Gate Quote
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="the Jester" data-source="post: 5767118" data-attributes="member: 1210"><p>I'll add to this- I did read the 4e DMG from cover to cover, and 4e is my current primary game. Check the 24 or so threads full of monsters by level that I've converted to 4e if you doubt my genuine love of the system. But that quote stuck out for me, too, as appallingly bad advice <em>for my group</em>, because we sometimes do like the meaningless, no-action, no-dice, no-real-consequence, pointless except for the joy of roleplaying encounters. My wizard player loves to rp with the local alchemist. The barbarian's player loves roleplaying in depth every chance he gets so that he can Conan out his attitude. The warden's player would be happy roleplaying his interaction with kids playing tag (and even rolling dice for it!). None of those encounters "means" a thing, or has any action, but they are all tons of fun for my group.</p><p></p><p>I'm not h4ting. I'm not saying that there is anything wrong with a group that prefers to skip all that. I'm just saying it is terrible advice for some groups, terrible advice that stuck out as a blemish in the 4e DMG, which I found to otherwise be a pretty good read (thought the DMG2 is far better! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />).</p><p></p><p>Consider this, too: one of the big criticisms many people level at 4e is that it encourages a minimal-rp, encounter-focused game. My campaign is pretty darn far from minimal-rp and it runs fine in 4e. But even I, loving 4th Edition as I do, can plainly see that it <em>does</em> promote a certain playstyle as optimal. Tiles and preprinted battlemaps, measurements in squares, the (awful) Delve format, etc etc etc... there are a lot of ways in which it pushes a very tactical combat game style. But my campaign is evidence that it works fine with other playstyles too. </p><p></p><p>The conclusion I'm getting at here is that 4e doesn't <em>have to</em> run as a skirmish-style game, but it actively encourages it. It's just fine as a framework for all that other "guards at the gates and fairy rings" stuff too.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="the Jester, post: 5767118, member: 1210"] I'll add to this- I did read the 4e DMG from cover to cover, and 4e is my current primary game. Check the 24 or so threads full of monsters by level that I've converted to 4e if you doubt my genuine love of the system. But that quote stuck out for me, too, as appallingly bad advice [i]for my group[/i], because we sometimes do like the meaningless, no-action, no-dice, no-real-consequence, pointless except for the joy of roleplaying encounters. My wizard player loves to rp with the local alchemist. The barbarian's player loves roleplaying in depth every chance he gets so that he can Conan out his attitude. The warden's player would be happy roleplaying his interaction with kids playing tag (and even rolling dice for it!). None of those encounters "means" a thing, or has any action, but they are all tons of fun for my group. I'm not h4ting. I'm not saying that there is anything wrong with a group that prefers to skip all that. I'm just saying it is terrible advice for some groups, terrible advice that stuck out as a blemish in the 4e DMG, which I found to otherwise be a pretty good read (thought the DMG2 is far better! :)). Consider this, too: one of the big criticisms many people level at 4e is that it encourages a minimal-rp, encounter-focused game. My campaign is pretty darn far from minimal-rp and it runs fine in 4e. But even I, loving 4th Edition as I do, can plainly see that it [i]does[/i] promote a certain playstyle as optimal. Tiles and preprinted battlemaps, measurements in squares, the (awful) Delve format, etc etc etc... there are a lot of ways in which it pushes a very tactical combat game style. But my campaign is evidence that it works fine with other playstyles too. The conclusion I'm getting at here is that 4e doesn't [i]have to[/i] run as a skirmish-style game, but it actively encourages it. It's just fine as a framework for all that other "guards at the gates and fairy rings" stuff too. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
The Guards at the Gate Quote
Top