Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Half Orc. Are they still needed?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="EzekielRaiden" data-source="post: 8686633" data-attributes="member: 6790260"><p>It depends on what you mean by "needed."</p><p></p><p>This is one of the (three-ish) incredibly frustrating standards I frequently see brought up in D&D discussions. Because, if you mean that in its usual sense, <strong><em>absolutely nothing is ever needed in D&D. Ever.</em></strong> There is no such thing as "necessity." Period. We don't <em>need</em> specific classes, we don't <em>need</em> specific rules structures, we don't <em>need</em> specific races, we don't <em>need</em> particular equipment or spells or feats or themes or <em>anything</em>.</p><p></p><p>But if you mean a specific, niche definition of "need," something like "does this have enough utility that it can't be ignored" or "is this sufficiently fundamental to D&D that getting rid of it is untenable," then it's unlikely that half-orcs are "needed," but there are <em>lots</em> of things present or added over time that aren't "needed." Orcs themselves don't seem to be any more or less "needed" than half-orcs. This means the answer to the question isn't very informative; we would need to ask something further, like "what does half-orc provide?" or the like, to really draw any meaningful conclusions.</p><p></p><p>That's the key problem with this question. It very, very easily becomes a motte-and-bailey fallacy, even without the author <em>intending</em> such, due to the fluid sense of the word "needed."</p><p></p><p>Now, engaging with the core premise of the thread assuming that "are half-orcs still needed" should <em>actually</em> be read as "are half-orcs still <em>useful</em>," my answer is unequivocally yes. I still see good things being done with them, and I still see them having a place in various fantastical settings. I don't have literal or figurative "skin in the game" when it comes to racial intermixing, being from a historically privileged ethnic background, so it's hard for me to have clear insight on that front. But I think it's worthwhile to have "child of two worlds" options, particularly given the people in my life who <em>have</em> been of biracial or polyracial backgrounds and who have personally felt a deep desire to explore that identity and what it means for them.</p><p></p><p>On the flipside, I absolutely, 100% agree that the disgusting and inappropriate backstory information for half-orcs from early editions has died the death it deserves, and will not dignify it with further discussion than this sentence. It should fade into obscurity as nothing more than an annoying quirk of history.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="EzekielRaiden, post: 8686633, member: 6790260"] It depends on what you mean by "needed." This is one of the (three-ish) incredibly frustrating standards I frequently see brought up in D&D discussions. Because, if you mean that in its usual sense, [B][I]absolutely nothing is ever needed in D&D. Ever.[/I][/B] There is no such thing as "necessity." Period. We don't [I]need[/I] specific classes, we don't [I]need[/I] specific rules structures, we don't [I]need[/I] specific races, we don't [I]need[/I] particular equipment or spells or feats or themes or [I]anything[/I]. But if you mean a specific, niche definition of "need," something like "does this have enough utility that it can't be ignored" or "is this sufficiently fundamental to D&D that getting rid of it is untenable," then it's unlikely that half-orcs are "needed," but there are [I]lots[/I] of things present or added over time that aren't "needed." Orcs themselves don't seem to be any more or less "needed" than half-orcs. This means the answer to the question isn't very informative; we would need to ask something further, like "what does half-orc provide?" or the like, to really draw any meaningful conclusions. That's the key problem with this question. It very, very easily becomes a motte-and-bailey fallacy, even without the author [I]intending[/I] such, due to the fluid sense of the word "needed." Now, engaging with the core premise of the thread assuming that "are half-orcs still needed" should [I]actually[/I] be read as "are half-orcs still [I]useful[/I]," my answer is unequivocally yes. I still see good things being done with them, and I still see them having a place in various fantastical settings. I don't have literal or figurative "skin in the game" when it comes to racial intermixing, being from a historically privileged ethnic background, so it's hard for me to have clear insight on that front. But I think it's worthwhile to have "child of two worlds" options, particularly given the people in my life who [I]have[/I] been of biracial or polyracial backgrounds and who have personally felt a deep desire to explore that identity and what it means for them. On the flipside, I absolutely, 100% agree that the disgusting and inappropriate backstory information for half-orcs from early editions has died the death it deserves, and will not dignify it with further discussion than this sentence. It should fade into obscurity as nothing more than an annoying quirk of history. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Half Orc. Are they still needed?
Top