Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Corwin" data-source="post: 4342647" data-attributes="member: 1560">OK, now just hold on a sec there...There is a big difference between an encounter &quot;ending&quot; (which may very well be a round after combat ends in some cases), and getting encounter powers back. You need to complete a short rest (a minimum of 5 minutes) to reset your encounter powers.So it seems a simple answer to his question. Why did this get you so worked up? Is it that neither of you knew this rule? In which case, it was a simple misunderstanding by both of you. Easily to remedy.Did you ask if they are doing it because they don't &quot;give a s+++&quot;? Or maybe they just have a different sensibility about what is or isn't consistent with the rules/reality of the game environment.Ah. So are we talking about your personal, biased, and quite possibly close-minded, opinion of the ranger class here? Is that what this is about? I'm sorry if you have players who want to play the character they imagined. And not something of your tastes.Would I be allowed to play my dwarf ranger who wields two battleaxes in your games? Or am I a big, rules-monkey jerk too? Just curious. Should rangers know what a battleaxe is either?Anyway, I've got a simple suggestion. Why don't you just build all the PCs yourself and hand them out to the players before the game? That way none of them offend your sensibilities.Seriously.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Corwin, post: 4342647, member: 1560"] OK, now just hold on a sec there... There is a big difference between an encounter "ending" (which may very well be a round after combat ends in some cases), and getting encounter powers back. You need to complete a short rest (a minimum of 5 [I]minute[/I]s) to reset your encounter powers. So it seems a simple answer to his question. Why did this get you so worked up? Is it that neither of you knew this rule? In which case, it was a simple misunderstanding by [I]both[/I] of you. Easily to remedy. Did you ask if they are doing it [I]because[/I] they don't "give a s+++"? Or maybe they just have a different sensibility about what is or isn't consistent with the rules/reality of the game environment. Ah. So are we talking about your [I]personal[/I], biased, and quite possibly [I]close-minded[/I], opinion of the ranger class here? Is that what this is about? I'm sorry if you have players who want to play the character they imagined. And not something of your tastes. Would I be allowed to play my dwarf ranger who wields two battleaxes in your games? Or am I a big, rules-monkey jerk too? Just curious. Should rangers know what a battleaxe is either? Anyway, I've got a simple suggestion. Why don't you just build all the PCs yourself and hand them out to the players before the game? That way none of them offend your sensibilities. Seriously. [/QUOTE]

Verification