Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Zhaleskra" data-source="post: 5605838" data-attributes="member: 20544">I hate posters who think that just because they have had a bunch of GMs they claim are bad who from their posts seem to think every GM who isn't in their group is therefore inevitably bad.Sometimes even if it's not the GMs work. The authors of the setting defined some parameters for me. I defined some more. Compromise is not telling the GM he really means "yes".I hate people who think small groups of people who actually get along with each other are somehow a bad thing.I hate players who don't understand that in order for me to run a game that's fun for them, it has to be fun for me too.I hate people who think an adversarial player/GM relationship is inevitable.I hate posters who claim to believe in benefit of the doubt, then no more than a sentence later in their post list the exact definition as well as their disagreement with it and thereby prove that they don't believe in it at all.I hate people who automatically assume when someone says they don't have a lot of time for gaming that it's somehow a cop-out.</blockquote>