Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The Hexblade (Essentials Warlock) is up!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="thewok" data-source="post: 5363574" data-attributes="member: 60907"><p>An interesting thing came up in the WotC CharOp forum. It was pointed out that the Blade of Annihilation is not a weapon at all, as it is labelled a Warlock <em>item</em>. It is an item that has certain properties like damage dice, proficiency bonus, etc. that <em>can be used as</em> a weapon.</p><p></p><p>Going along with this, the hexblade would not need heavy blade expertise or weapon focus, but would use the expertise and focus related to the implement used to summon the pact weapon.</p><p></p><p>The text in question is:</p><p></p><p>"<strong>You can make weapon attacks with your pact weapon</strong>, using its proficiency bonus and the appropriate damage die. Your pact weapon shares your implement’s enhancement bonus, critical hit effect, properties, and powers. The weapon cannot be enchanted."</p><p></p><p>Why point out that you can make weapon attacks with the pact weapon if it already is a weapon? It is worded as if it is giving special persmission to do such a thing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="thewok, post: 5363574, member: 60907"] An interesting thing came up in the WotC CharOp forum. It was pointed out that the Blade of Annihilation is not a weapon at all, as it is labelled a Warlock [I]item[/I]. It is an item that has certain properties like damage dice, proficiency bonus, etc. that [I]can be used as[/I] a weapon. Going along with this, the hexblade would not need heavy blade expertise or weapon focus, but would use the expertise and focus related to the implement used to summon the pact weapon. The text in question is: "[B]You can make weapon attacks with your pact weapon[/B], using its proficiency bonus and the appropriate damage die. Your pact weapon shares your implement’s enhancement bonus, critical hit effect, properties, and powers. The weapon cannot be enchanted." Why point out that you can make weapon attacks with the pact weapon if it already is a weapon? It is worded as if it is giving special persmission to do such a thing. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The Hexblade (Essentials Warlock) is up!
Top