Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The high-level play I'm hoping for.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="the Jester" data-source="post: 6249235" data-attributes="member: 1210"><p>Perhaps I missed it, as this is a huge long thread full of words and stuff, but I don't think you've addressed my earlier response to your "required levels" shtick.</p><p></p><p>So, let's lay it out again: </p><p></p><p>First, <strong>why does only the PH count as rules text?</strong> A rule that has explicitly applied to every edition that has a DMG is "In case of contradictions, the later rules text trumps the earlier text". And the DMG always comes after the PH. Therefore, the DMG's text about "you can play whatever levels you want" is actually a bit of rules text that, technically, <em>supercedes</em> the fact that the tables in the PH go up to 30.</p><p></p><p>Which doesn't even address the absurdity of the idea that just because it's in the books, you MUST include it in your campaign. 4e edged closer to that philosophy than previous editions, yes, but still explicitly gave the DM the word that he didn't have to.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, would you say that "you are in the realm of GM fiat or even homebrew" if you run a one-shot adventure at a convention that doesn't feature the full swath of levels in the PH? Because that's the exact same thing as running a campaign from 1st to 6th (or 1st to 20th) level, in terms of not going to 30.</p><p></p><p>Do you think a game is equally removed from the rules if I ban a class, say monks, or if I say, "We don't have dwarves in this world"? Is a 1e game "homebrewed and in the realm of GM fiat" because it doesn't go up to 29th level? And where does 3e say that it only goes to level 20? I could be wrong- I'd need a citation- but I don't think it does, anywhere, ever, in 3.0 or 3.5</p><p></p><p>Why all this focus on going up to level 30? Who is holding a gun to your head- and your players'- and forcing you to play above 1st if you don't want to?</p><p></p><p>And more- why do you care if other people want to play high levels differently than you? If the game supports your style and theirs, why don't you celebrate the fact that more people get what they want? And yes, you CAN play epic-level 4e without fighting gods or arch-devils; you CAN keep it to orc hordes and high-level villainous humans if you want. It's surprisingly easy. Trust me- I'm running epic 4e, and while sometimes it's all gods and demons, at other times it's high level necromancers, death priests and troglodyte zombies galore. Both work; both are supported; you aren't left out. Why is it important to NOT support the guys who want their gods statted and available to kill (which, I'll remind you, is a tradition going back to at least 1e)?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="the Jester, post: 6249235, member: 1210"] Perhaps I missed it, as this is a huge long thread full of words and stuff, but I don't think you've addressed my earlier response to your "required levels" shtick. So, let's lay it out again: First, [b]why does only the PH count as rules text?[/b] A rule that has explicitly applied to every edition that has a DMG is "In case of contradictions, the later rules text trumps the earlier text". And the DMG always comes after the PH. Therefore, the DMG's text about "you can play whatever levels you want" is actually a bit of rules text that, technically, [i]supercedes[/i] the fact that the tables in the PH go up to 30. Which doesn't even address the absurdity of the idea that just because it's in the books, you MUST include it in your campaign. 4e edged closer to that philosophy than previous editions, yes, but still explicitly gave the DM the word that he didn't have to. Anyway, would you say that "you are in the realm of GM fiat or even homebrew" if you run a one-shot adventure at a convention that doesn't feature the full swath of levels in the PH? Because that's the exact same thing as running a campaign from 1st to 6th (or 1st to 20th) level, in terms of not going to 30. Do you think a game is equally removed from the rules if I ban a class, say monks, or if I say, "We don't have dwarves in this world"? Is a 1e game "homebrewed and in the realm of GM fiat" because it doesn't go up to 29th level? And where does 3e say that it only goes to level 20? I could be wrong- I'd need a citation- but I don't think it does, anywhere, ever, in 3.0 or 3.5 Why all this focus on going up to level 30? Who is holding a gun to your head- and your players'- and forcing you to play above 1st if you don't want to? And more- why do you care if other people want to play high levels differently than you? If the game supports your style and theirs, why don't you celebrate the fact that more people get what they want? And yes, you CAN play epic-level 4e without fighting gods or arch-devils; you CAN keep it to orc hordes and high-level villainous humans if you want. It's surprisingly easy. Trust me- I'm running epic 4e, and while sometimes it's all gods and demons, at other times it's high level necromancers, death priests and troglodyte zombies galore. Both work; both are supported; you aren't left out. Why is it important to NOT support the guys who want their gods statted and available to kill (which, I'll remind you, is a tradition going back to at least 1e)? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The high-level play I'm hoping for.
Top