Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The History of 'Immersion' in RPGs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jgsugden" data-source="post: 8191622" data-attributes="member: 2629"><p>The full quote: <em>Roleplaying is, literally, the act of playing out a role. In this case, it’s you as a player determining how your character thinks, acts, and talks.</em>You decide how your character thinks, acts and talks to playing out that role. That role is defined. You build the definition, under the rules, during character creation. Not playing <em>that</em> role is not playing <em>this</em> role playing game, as described by the books. It can still be fun, but ignoring the character limitations you built into the PC during character creation - well it is just as fair as having your 6 Strength PC life a boulder weighing 300 lbs. </p><p>The DM does not spontaneously say that sentence. They feel the need to do so when immersion has been broken by a PC not playing their character. It might be the DM feeling it by themself, or it may be the entire table. </p><p></p><p>Again - if you don't want to play a character as it is defined by the rules, and the people at your table don't care - you can have a lot of fun ignoring what the rules say about your PC. However, if your 6 intelligence PC is allowed to exhibit abnormally high levels of intelligence, it is very similar to a 6 strength PC lifting that boulder - you didn't "buy" the capability during character creation - but you're using it anyways. Many players and DM object to it just as much as they object to a player lying about die rolls.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jgsugden, post: 8191622, member: 2629"] The full quote: [i]Roleplaying is, literally, the act of playing out a role. In this case, it’s you as a player determining how your character thinks, acts, and talks.[/i]You decide how your character thinks, acts and talks to playing out that role. That role is defined. You build the definition, under the rules, during character creation. Not playing [I]that[/I] role is not playing [I]this[/I] role playing game, as described by the books. It can still be fun, but ignoring the character limitations you built into the PC during character creation - well it is just as fair as having your 6 Strength PC life a boulder weighing 300 lbs. The DM does not spontaneously say that sentence. They feel the need to do so when immersion has been broken by a PC not playing their character. It might be the DM feeling it by themself, or it may be the entire table. Again - if you don't want to play a character as it is defined by the rules, and the people at your table don't care - you can have a lot of fun ignoring what the rules say about your PC. However, if your 6 intelligence PC is allowed to exhibit abnormally high levels of intelligence, it is very similar to a 6 strength PC lifting that boulder - you didn't "buy" the capability during character creation - but you're using it anyways. Many players and DM object to it just as much as they object to a player lying about die rolls. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The History of 'Immersion' in RPGs
Top