Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy (merged)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="D+1" data-source="post: 2214016" data-attributes="member: 13654"><p>7/10 Reasonably good but not in danger of being great. Read the books, watched the TV series. Read more books. As a minor afficianado of things Hitchhiker I think you COULD have expected a LOT more from a movie version - but it's not Lord of the Rings, so this is about right in its degree of faithfulness and so forth. You weren't ever going to get a masterful 12-hour 3-5 film epic comedic treatment so anyone who does complain on that score clearly has little touch with reality.</p><p></p><p>What you wind up with is a good, very watchable effort to take Hitchhiker material and present it to The Great Unwashed. I think they could have done a little better. First and foremost the pacing and timing in the initial parts there was off. Thinking back on it now it did feel as if it expected that you already knew the story because it wasn't until the middle of the film that exposition really seemed to catch up to the ongoing plot and that's NOT good for a comedy that relies on being able to wrap people up in the crazy universe it presents.</p><p></p><p>I think it's because they still were relying a little too much on the books/series/etc. rather than making a movie that stands unsupported on its own. Movies, even comedies, have much different dramatic requirements than television or the written word. You've got about 90 minutes to 2 hours to go from knowing NOTHING about the characters or the world to sending people walking out of the theater completely versed in it all. Hitchhiker fell short of that requirement IMO, but to give them their due they had a lot of material to try to compress/cull to get one cohesive movie out of it. Eric's right - too much screen time on Vogons that could have been better used elsewhere. No Oscar for adapted screenplay but A for effort.</p><p></p><p>The characters were all just GREAT. Rockwell and Deschanel were particularly good in their parts. First thing I've seen Rockwell in since Galaxy Quest, and I recognized Deschanel from Elf and I could watch both of them in dang near anything in the future. Actually I think Mos Def did quite well too as Ford but with Ford and Arthur, especially early in the film, several of their lines got stomped on and I missed the dialogue. At first I thought it was just bad sound editing (and it was) but I think the accents and annunciation contributed.</p><p></p><p>So, well worth the $9 ticket but I wouldn't expect too many new converts to the cult.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="D+1, post: 2214016, member: 13654"] 7/10 Reasonably good but not in danger of being great. Read the books, watched the TV series. Read more books. As a minor afficianado of things Hitchhiker I think you COULD have expected a LOT more from a movie version - but it's not Lord of the Rings, so this is about right in its degree of faithfulness and so forth. You weren't ever going to get a masterful 12-hour 3-5 film epic comedic treatment so anyone who does complain on that score clearly has little touch with reality. What you wind up with is a good, very watchable effort to take Hitchhiker material and present it to The Great Unwashed. I think they could have done a little better. First and foremost the pacing and timing in the initial parts there was off. Thinking back on it now it did feel as if it expected that you already knew the story because it wasn't until the middle of the film that exposition really seemed to catch up to the ongoing plot and that's NOT good for a comedy that relies on being able to wrap people up in the crazy universe it presents. I think it's because they still were relying a little too much on the books/series/etc. rather than making a movie that stands unsupported on its own. Movies, even comedies, have much different dramatic requirements than television or the written word. You've got about 90 minutes to 2 hours to go from knowing NOTHING about the characters or the world to sending people walking out of the theater completely versed in it all. Hitchhiker fell short of that requirement IMO, but to give them their due they had a lot of material to try to compress/cull to get one cohesive movie out of it. Eric's right - too much screen time on Vogons that could have been better used elsewhere. No Oscar for adapted screenplay but A for effort. The characters were all just GREAT. Rockwell and Deschanel were particularly good in their parts. First thing I've seen Rockwell in since Galaxy Quest, and I recognized Deschanel from Elf and I could watch both of them in dang near anything in the future. Actually I think Mos Def did quite well too as Ford but with Ford and Arthur, especially early in the film, several of their lines got stomped on and I missed the dialogue. At first I thought it was just bad sound editing (and it was) but I think the accents and annunciation contributed. So, well worth the $9 ticket but I wouldn't expect too many new converts to the cult. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy (merged)
Top