Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey reactions (SPOILERS)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="horacethegrey" data-source="post: 6060250" data-attributes="member: 40123"><p>Allow me to be the first to comment on this film. </p><p></p><p>As the first part in a trilogy, this movie is not as good as <em>The Fellowship of the Ring</em>. While Peter Jackson manages to conjure some fantastic visuals and get some great performances from his actors, he loads the movie with unnecessary filler that slows the films pacing to a crawl, thus making this movie feel like three hours.</p><p></p><p>But don't fret, this isn't a disaster of <em>The Phantom Menace</em> proportions. Jackson's is a smarter director than that, but it's still a slight disappointment over what came before it.</p><p></p><p>Let's get to the good stuff first. Martin Freeman is <strong>perfect </strong>as Bilbo. I've no complaints whatsoever on his performance. The same goes for Andy Serkis returning as Gollum. And would you believe it? The advances in CG and motion capture technology have made him more realistic and lifelike than ever before. The subtle change in expressions that Serkis pulls off are even more believable than they were in <em>LOTR</em>. Just watch how Freeman and Serkis play the Riddles in the Dark scene, which is fantastic. And then there's Mckellen as Gandalf, who somehow tops his performance in <em>LOTR </em>by bringing back a key element to The Grey Pilgrim that was absent before, that of being a sly manipulator. Richard Armitage also does fine as Thorin Oakenshield, bringing noble bearing and stubbornness to his portrayal. And speaking of dwarves, I never expected Jackson would be able to top the prologue from Fellowship, but the fall of Erebor does just that. It's an incredible sequence.</p><p></p><p>But now let's get into the downside here. This movie feels LONG. Where Fellowship moved at a brisk pace, this film is bogged down by fluff that could have been left at the cutting room floor. The inclusion of the subplot regarding the Necromancer don't add anything to the film, nor does the inclusion of new material that Tolkien never wrote, like Radgast. Even the cameos of <em>LOTR </em>regulars like Galadriel, Elrond and Saruman feel glaringly out of place, or the scene between the Elder Bilbo and Frodo in the prologue. For me, the best stuff in the movie are those that are closest to Tolkien's book. It would have been better had the movie just focused on Bilbo and the Dwarves.</p><p></p><p>So, there be my thoughts. While I still think this is solid fantasy film, it could have been so much better.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="horacethegrey, post: 6060250, member: 40123"] Allow me to be the first to comment on this film. As the first part in a trilogy, this movie is not as good as [I]The Fellowship of the Ring[/I]. While Peter Jackson manages to conjure some fantastic visuals and get some great performances from his actors, he loads the movie with unnecessary filler that slows the films pacing to a crawl, thus making this movie feel like three hours. But don't fret, this isn't a disaster of [I]The Phantom Menace[/I] proportions. Jackson's is a smarter director than that, but it's still a slight disappointment over what came before it. Let's get to the good stuff first. Martin Freeman is [B]perfect [/B]as Bilbo. I've no complaints whatsoever on his performance. The same goes for Andy Serkis returning as Gollum. And would you believe it? The advances in CG and motion capture technology have made him more realistic and lifelike than ever before. The subtle change in expressions that Serkis pulls off are even more believable than they were in [I]LOTR[/I]. Just watch how Freeman and Serkis play the Riddles in the Dark scene, which is fantastic. And then there's Mckellen as Gandalf, who somehow tops his performance in [I]LOTR [/I]by bringing back a key element to The Grey Pilgrim that was absent before, that of being a sly manipulator. Richard Armitage also does fine as Thorin Oakenshield, bringing noble bearing and stubbornness to his portrayal. And speaking of dwarves, I never expected Jackson would be able to top the prologue from Fellowship, but the fall of Erebor does just that. It's an incredible sequence. But now let's get into the downside here. This movie feels LONG. Where Fellowship moved at a brisk pace, this film is bogged down by fluff that could have been left at the cutting room floor. The inclusion of the subplot regarding the Necromancer don't add anything to the film, nor does the inclusion of new material that Tolkien never wrote, like Radgast. Even the cameos of [I]LOTR [/I]regulars like Galadriel, Elrond and Saruman feel glaringly out of place, or the scene between the Elder Bilbo and Frodo in the prologue. For me, the best stuff in the movie are those that are closest to Tolkien's book. It would have been better had the movie just focused on Bilbo and the Dwarves. So, there be my thoughts. While I still think this is solid fantasy film, it could have been so much better. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey reactions (SPOILERS)
Top