Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Human Side of D&D History - From Gary Gygax to Temple of Elemental Evil
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="arakasi" data-source="post: 9523023" data-attributes="member: 45744"><p>There is one aspect of Gygax's words that I haven't seen mentioned that occurred to me:</p><p></p><p>We know the parts of OD&D books that are considered problematic, and his forum posts defending biological determinism. From these we know that Gygax realized fairly early on that D&D, in his experience, did not appeal to female gamers as much as it did to men.</p><p></p><p>So that puts a little more context to his1975 comments in EUROPA magazine: he knew that D&D did not appeal to women. He received feedback telling him what he could do to make it more appealing to women (more emphasis on the female role, more non-gendered names, etc...). So how did he react?</p><p></p><p>His defenders say he responded with sarcasm. Is this really a defense though? Women reached out to him to tell him how he could make D&D more appealing to them and he responds with sarcasm. A sarcastic response is not a joke - it is a way to tell your audience that you do not consider the triggering statement to be worthy of a serious answer - and this is directed towards people who are interested in the game.</p><p></p><p>( for the record, I view the first part of his comments to be sarcastic, but everything from "Damn right, I'm a sexist" is in deadly earnest. I can't envision using "damn right" for emphasis in a sarcastic manner - it screams real anger to me)</p><p></p><p>And then, years later, he talks about biological determinism, in which he comes right out to say, effectively, that women do not like to play games, except for the games they do like to play because those aren't really games. And he used an example of Lionel making pastel colored trains to appeal to girls as evidence that coding toys to girls doesn't work.</p><p></p><p>Can you really read Gygax's forum posts without seeing them as an " It's not me, it's you" response?</p><p></p><p>Gygax was told early on what he could do to make D&D more appealing to women in a way far more significant than coloring things pastel. Rather than using this as an opportunity to learn from his customers, he sarcasticly mocked their concerns and justified it by blaming everyone else, rather than consider that his game could be improved.</p><p></p><p>TSR era gamers were < 10% female. Currently, the numbers are around 40%. Maybe if Gygax had taken the criticisms seriously and made an effort to appeal to female gamers back in 1e AD&D and B/X, TSR would not have been in the dire financial straits of 1984-85 that led to the management shakeup. </p><p></p><p>But in 2005, he was still blaming women for having the wrong type of brain to enjoy D&D.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="arakasi, post: 9523023, member: 45744"] There is one aspect of Gygax's words that I haven't seen mentioned that occurred to me: We know the parts of OD&D books that are considered problematic, and his forum posts defending biological determinism. From these we know that Gygax realized fairly early on that D&D, in his experience, did not appeal to female gamers as much as it did to men. So that puts a little more context to his1975 comments in EUROPA magazine: he knew that D&D did not appeal to women. He received feedback telling him what he could do to make it more appealing to women (more emphasis on the female role, more non-gendered names, etc...). So how did he react? His defenders say he responded with sarcasm. Is this really a defense though? Women reached out to him to tell him how he could make D&D more appealing to them and he responds with sarcasm. A sarcastic response is not a joke - it is a way to tell your audience that you do not consider the triggering statement to be worthy of a serious answer - and this is directed towards people who are interested in the game. ( for the record, I view the first part of his comments to be sarcastic, but everything from "Damn right, I'm a sexist" is in deadly earnest. I can't envision using "damn right" for emphasis in a sarcastic manner - it screams real anger to me) And then, years later, he talks about biological determinism, in which he comes right out to say, effectively, that women do not like to play games, except for the games they do like to play because those aren't really games. And he used an example of Lionel making pastel colored trains to appeal to girls as evidence that coding toys to girls doesn't work. Can you really read Gygax's forum posts without seeing them as an " It's not me, it's you" response? Gygax was told early on what he could do to make D&D more appealing to women in a way far more significant than coloring things pastel. Rather than using this as an opportunity to learn from his customers, he sarcasticly mocked their concerns and justified it by blaming everyone else, rather than consider that his game could be improved. TSR era gamers were < 10% female. Currently, the numbers are around 40%. Maybe if Gygax had taken the criticisms seriously and made an effort to appeal to female gamers back in 1e AD&D and B/X, TSR would not have been in the dire financial straits of 1984-85 that led to the management shakeup. But in 2005, he was still blaming women for having the wrong type of brain to enjoy D&D. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Human Side of D&D History - From Gary Gygax to Temple of Elemental Evil
Top