Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Steampunkette" data-source="post: 9523135" data-attributes="member: 6796468">This is a dodge, Max. And I think you know that.You have put forth an argument. I pointed out you put forth that argument. You said you did not put forth that argument. I pointed to where you put forth that argument. You said "I did it because of the history of the discussion."The history of the discussion may be the reason you felt the need to include those words into your current argument: But it's -still- your current argument. The context of why you put that into your current argument is irrelevant to it being your current argument which you've claimed you did not make and been confronted as having made.Do you stand by your "He wasn't as sexist as these other sexists" statement as your argument or do you want to reframe your argument to exclude that?'Cause right now, the argument you've made outright, explicitly, defends Gygax's sexism by minimizing it in comparison to other, worse, forms of sexism that also exist.Which is why so many people are saying, even though you've explicitly denied it, that you're defending Gygax's sexism.</blockquote>