Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="DND_Reborn" data-source="post: 8637531" data-attributes="member: 6987520">Your timing is very appropriate considering my thread here that I just posted:[URL unfurl=&quot;true&quot;]https://www.enworld.org/threads/spending-downtime-training-for-asis.688549/#post-8637518[/URL]Which is a direct result of a conversation I had a couple days ago with another player about the very idea of not increasing ability scores via ASIs.IME ASIs are there just to increase the PCs' chances / bonuses. The compete with feats which makes them a poor design implementation IMO since 90+% of games use feats.So, I prefer moving them to a downtime activity, which makes more sense to me and removes the competition with feats.Another route I would prefer would be expanding the proficiency bonus progression from +2 to +6 to something like +2 to +10, then the ASIs for number bumping would be unnecessary for the most part.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="DND_Reborn, post: 8637531, member: 6987520"] Your timing is very appropriate considering my thread here that I just posted: [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.enworld.org/threads/spending-downtime-training-for-asis.688549/#post-8637518[/URL] Which is a direct result of a conversation I had a couple days ago with another player about the very idea of not increasing ability scores via ASIs. IME ASIs are there just to increase the PCs' chances / bonuses. The compete with feats which makes them a poor design implementation IMO since 90+% of games use feats. So, I prefer moving them to a downtime activity, which makes more sense to me and removes the competition with feats. Another route I would prefer would be expanding the proficiency bonus progression from +2 to +6 to something like +2 to +10, then the ASIs for number bumping would be unnecessary for the most part. [/QUOTE]

Verification