Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="FrogReaver" data-source="post: 8065699" data-attributes="member: 6795602">so I typed out some very thoughtful posts About the mitigating points of your sims methodology and you can’t accept that those are valid points. Instead you say you will ignore me. &nbsp;I can’t see your game history so I can only speculate on how it compares to the sim.&nbsp; It’s like you expect me to just take your word on it. I won’t.&nbsp; It’s very well in the realm of possibility that your game history is a good measure of overkill effect.&nbsp; But it’s also possible that it’s not. I can’t see it so the best I can do is compare it to the sim results.&nbsp; The best I can do is say what you believe to be strong evidence of your position isn’t as strong as you think. Because while your sim and actual results were Believed to be in alignment that bolstered your point but when your sim and actuals aren’t in alignment that’s evidence your actuals May be skewed.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="FrogReaver, post: 8065699, member: 6795602"] so I typed out some very thoughtful posts About the mitigating points of your sims methodology and you can’t accept that those are valid points. Instead you say you will ignore me. I can’t see your game history so I can only speculate on how it compares to the sim. It’s like you expect me to just take your word on it. I won’t. It’s very well in the realm of possibility that your game history is a good measure of overkill effect. But it’s also possible that it’s not. I can’t see it so the best I can do is compare it to the sim results. The best I can do is say what you believe to be strong evidence of your position isn’t as strong as you think. Because while your sim and actual results were Believed to be in alignment that bolstered your point but when your sim and actuals aren’t in alignment that’s evidence your actuals May be skewed. [/QUOTE]

Verification