Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Importance of Verisimilitude (or "Why you don't need realism to keep it real")
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Alzrius" data-source="post: 9151018" data-attributes="member: 8461"><p>It's not indefinite, but rather until there's a practical aspect to be taken into account, rather than an aspirational one. (The kicker, naturally, being that you can't really attach a practical definition with universal application to a comparative state of options available to characters in a game that has little-to-no hard-and-fast situational parameters and anything can be attempted.)</p><p></p><p>I disagree that viability is straightforward, here, because even if we leave aside the issues of how you quantitatively measure the chances of success (which are, at best, an issue of dice probabilities), there's even less ways of applying a metric to "less-contributing" and "equally-weighted."</p><p></p><p>The point which I'm trying to make here is that this is a rabbit hole which, similar to the prospect of some sort of immersive verisimilitude which appears to be tantalizingly close if only we add just a <em>few more</em> options, can't be achieved. Or at least, can't be achieved in any objective sense; personal satisfaction is the best there is. </p><p></p><p>Chess is a very well-balanced game, but if your opponent is Gary Kasparov, then despite having an equal number of pieces of equal capability, he'll still dominate the game. That's not a perfect analogy for a cooperative game, but I'm of the opinion that the central conceit remains true: that while balance in principle of design isn't unimportant, the bulk of its application depends entirely on the particulars of any given game session, which isn't something the rulebooks can mandate.</p><p></p><p>In that regard (and to bring things back around on topic), I think that verisimilitude is an answer to the problem of balance, because it presents a rational counterpoint in explaining <em>why</em> that balance isn't attainable, nor necessary to the quality of the game. From the way(s) that magic works on down through the reasons the party finds themselves in a particular scenario, the immersive quality offers a satisfactory explanation for why one character might have more options than another <em>right now</em>, and that's okay.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Alzrius, post: 9151018, member: 8461"] It's not indefinite, but rather until there's a practical aspect to be taken into account, rather than an aspirational one. (The kicker, naturally, being that you can't really attach a practical definition with universal application to a comparative state of options available to characters in a game that has little-to-no hard-and-fast situational parameters and anything can be attempted.) I disagree that viability is straightforward, here, because even if we leave aside the issues of how you quantitatively measure the chances of success (which are, at best, an issue of dice probabilities), there's even less ways of applying a metric to "less-contributing" and "equally-weighted." The point which I'm trying to make here is that this is a rabbit hole which, similar to the prospect of some sort of immersive verisimilitude which appears to be tantalizingly close if only we add just a [i]few more[/i] options, can't be achieved. Or at least, can't be achieved in any objective sense; personal satisfaction is the best there is. Chess is a very well-balanced game, but if your opponent is Gary Kasparov, then despite having an equal number of pieces of equal capability, he'll still dominate the game. That's not a perfect analogy for a cooperative game, but I'm of the opinion that the central conceit remains true: that while balance in principle of design isn't unimportant, the bulk of its application depends entirely on the particulars of any given game session, which isn't something the rulebooks can mandate. In that regard (and to bring things back around on topic), I think that verisimilitude is an answer to the problem of balance, because it presents a rational counterpoint in explaining [i]why[/i] that balance isn't attainable, nor necessary to the quality of the game. From the way(s) that magic works on down through the reasons the party finds themselves in a particular scenario, the immersive quality offers a satisfactory explanation for why one character might have more options than another [i]right now[/i], and that's okay. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Importance of Verisimilitude (or "Why you don't need realism to keep it real")
Top