Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The Inverse Trek Law?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Orryn Emrys" data-source="post: 4069433" data-attributes="member: 6799"><p>I don't know... I've been playing and running D&D games since about 1983. Original <em>Dungeons & Dragons</em> was a cool and simple system that gave fuel to an endless variety of wonky ideas and unbalanced schemes, with just enough rules to make it all work. The BECMI system was a whole lot of fun, throwing new and different ways to play into the mix with each release. 1st Edition AD&D was an extravagent set of uncoordinated subsystems that, fortunately, could be pillaged for what was necessary to run a great game. If some of the rules were simply ridiculously cumbersome (encumbrance, for example... pun intended) or patently non-sensical (1E bards jump to mind), or thoroughly unbalanced (I'm thinkin' psionics here... which was, of course, quite optional), they could be ignored without breaking the game, as long as a modicum of common sense was implemented. Good times were had by all.</p><p></p><p>I resisted the 2nd Edition switch with great tenacity. I'd spent years collecting what seemed to me at the time a veritable library of sourcebooks, and I had no intention of starting completely over. It was 1990 before I took the plunge, upon encountering new players who preferred the new system. 2E seemed brilliant to me at the time! The reorganization of the spell system, the new initiative rules and combat options (though I never liked rolling on a chart to see what unarmed combat or grapple maneuver your character decided to try), the restructured races and classes (yeah! 1st-level bards!)... and the continued (and persistent) expansion of character ideas with the 7,000 other books I couldn't keep from purchasing in the years that followed.</p><p></p><p>Then came 3E. Ironically, in the year or two prior to the announcement I'd started developing my own sort of game system. I abandoned the project when Eric Noah's website and the "countdown" articles in <em>Dragon Magazine</em> started showing me that 3E was going to be moving in a very similar direction to my own efforts... and was going to do it a lot better. I've never regretted getting behind the 3rd Edition release and supporting it from the get-go. We've had a fantastic run with it, and I was blissfully oblivious to the various challenges that the system provided me, as a Dungeon Master, in running the games as I wanted them to be. Certainly, there were things I avoided because the system made them so high-maintenance (large numbers of enemies, writing up numerous high-level NPCs, enemies that stacked their buff spells overly much), but I really just accepted all that as part of the system and made the game work.</p><p></p><p>I eventually overcame many of these complications with the advent of <em>DM Genie</em> and <em>NPC Designer</em> and such. Computerized campaign maintenance and combat management really made things possible that hadn't been before. It's been fun. I am, however, no longer oblivious, and I'm ready to see a game system that empowers me to do what I can imagine from the outset. I'm ambivalent about some of the "fluff" elements that have made their way onto the internet, but I'm not much for assuming that they represent the whole of the game. The rules, however, seem to me to have great potential.</p><p></p><p>To my way of thinking... None of the editions have really sucked. They haven't been perfect, by any stretch, with a smattering of strengths and weaknesses. But they are what you make of them. They've allowed me a lifetime of D&D, and it has been excellent, whatever the system.</p><p></p><p>I may not like everything they do, but I will approach the future with optimism and the will to cull whatever I wish from the system to come. I eagerly await the release of 4th Edition, 5th, 6th... what have you. And if I decide to continue to play 3.5, I don't imagine I'll ever look on the changes to come as anything but good.</p><p></p><p>Change is good. And if I want gnomes in my game, there will damn well be gnomes in my game.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Orryn Emrys, post: 4069433, member: 6799"] I don't know... I've been playing and running D&D games since about 1983. Original [i]Dungeons & Dragons[/i] was a cool and simple system that gave fuel to an endless variety of wonky ideas and unbalanced schemes, with just enough rules to make it all work. The BECMI system was a whole lot of fun, throwing new and different ways to play into the mix with each release. 1st Edition AD&D was an extravagent set of uncoordinated subsystems that, fortunately, could be pillaged for what was necessary to run a great game. If some of the rules were simply ridiculously cumbersome (encumbrance, for example... pun intended) or patently non-sensical (1E bards jump to mind), or thoroughly unbalanced (I'm thinkin' psionics here... which was, of course, quite optional), they could be ignored without breaking the game, as long as a modicum of common sense was implemented. Good times were had by all. I resisted the 2nd Edition switch with great tenacity. I'd spent years collecting what seemed to me at the time a veritable library of sourcebooks, and I had no intention of starting completely over. It was 1990 before I took the plunge, upon encountering new players who preferred the new system. 2E seemed brilliant to me at the time! The reorganization of the spell system, the new initiative rules and combat options (though I never liked rolling on a chart to see what unarmed combat or grapple maneuver your character decided to try), the restructured races and classes (yeah! 1st-level bards!)... and the continued (and persistent) expansion of character ideas with the 7,000 other books I couldn't keep from purchasing in the years that followed. Then came 3E. Ironically, in the year or two prior to the announcement I'd started developing my own sort of game system. I abandoned the project when Eric Noah's website and the "countdown" articles in [i]Dragon Magazine[/i] started showing me that 3E was going to be moving in a very similar direction to my own efforts... and was going to do it a lot better. I've never regretted getting behind the 3rd Edition release and supporting it from the get-go. We've had a fantastic run with it, and I was blissfully oblivious to the various challenges that the system provided me, as a Dungeon Master, in running the games as I wanted them to be. Certainly, there were things I avoided because the system made them so high-maintenance (large numbers of enemies, writing up numerous high-level NPCs, enemies that stacked their buff spells overly much), but I really just accepted all that as part of the system and made the game work. I eventually overcame many of these complications with the advent of [i]DM Genie[/i] and [i]NPC Designer[/i] and such. Computerized campaign maintenance and combat management really made things possible that hadn't been before. It's been fun. I am, however, no longer oblivious, and I'm ready to see a game system that empowers me to do what I can imagine from the outset. I'm ambivalent about some of the "fluff" elements that have made their way onto the internet, but I'm not much for assuming that they represent the whole of the game. The rules, however, seem to me to have great potential. To my way of thinking... None of the editions have really sucked. They haven't been perfect, by any stretch, with a smattering of strengths and weaknesses. But they are what you make of them. They've allowed me a lifetime of D&D, and it has been excellent, whatever the system. I may not like everything they do, but I will approach the future with optimism and the will to cull whatever I wish from the system to come. I eagerly await the release of 4th Edition, 5th, 6th... what have you. And if I decide to continue to play 3.5, I don't imagine I'll ever look on the changes to come as anything but good. Change is good. And if I want gnomes in my game, there will damn well be gnomes in my game. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The Inverse Trek Law?
Top