NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="WSmith" data-source="post: 178623" data-attributes="member: 106">Greetings! SHARK, and mmadsen, two of some of my favorite posters. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /> I have two classes I love equally. The first is the barbarian. The second is the ranger.  I never really liked the straight knight archtype. Heavy armor never appealed to me. Therefore it was apparant what choices to make. SHARK, do you have a barbarian class for your campaign completed? I would love to see it. Back to the rangers. I love the concept of a lightly armored fighter, skilled in stealth, proficient with ranged weapons, able to blend into the wilds around him, and swift to pounce on his prey, be it man or beast! He may have some knowledge of healing herbs and plants, as well as wilderness survival techniques. He is fast and silent. Neither assassin nor knight, but able to fall in somewhere in the middle. I don't care about rangers spellcasting. Take that away, and I would be more happy.  I like the WOT Woodsman. I don't mind the TWF/ambi thing for the core ranger, but don't think it should be standard. I like the idea of customizable "fighting styles." Oh, and before Jack Daniel attacks, <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" />  no, I don't think there is anything wrong with the core ranger mechanic wise, just for flavor flexability. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" />  I certainly understand the rules getting in the way of creativity. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> Go, SHARK! Do you have a map of your setting?</blockquote>

Verification