Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Lackluster Ranger
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ashrym" data-source="post: 9519979" data-attributes="member: 6750235"><p>These questions don't seem relevant in the 2024 changes. Favored Enemy was updated to Hunter's Mark free uses and modifications. Favored terrain is now Expertise, Roving, and Tireless.</p><p></p><p>Each of those is applicable everywhere.</p><p></p><p>I think the important question is "Will I have fun?"</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The ranger was changed for Tasha's and changed again in the 2024 updates.</p><p></p><p>I don't think that implies a resistance to change. I think demonstrates an inability to appease all ranger fans while remaining within WotC's goals.</p><p></p><p>Players were asking for Hunter's Mark to be a class ability in 5e. Listening to players isn't solving perceived issues. Players seem to perceive more or different issues regardless when it come to implementing rangers.</p><p></p><p>Changing rangers to a non-spellcasting class, for example, is likely going to cause some players to complain about the lack of magic and others to complain about balance between rangers, fighters, and rogues. It kind seems like lose-lose no matter what WotC does with the class at this point, unfortunately.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Everyone is worse at skills compared to the rogue. </p><p></p><p> Skill focused characters tend to be weaker than their counterparts though. Rogues are generally weaker than other martial classes. Bards are generally weaker than other major spellcasters. Rangers are the jack of all trades class and generally seen as weaker.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I have mixed thoughts on this.</p><p></p><p>Full casters are going to have similar issues. It's not like a glamour bard is going to be able to charm or frighten an immune target either. That's when it's time to break out a back up spell like entangle, ensnaring strike, or grasping vine; or an AoE like hail of thorns or conjure barrage.</p><p></p><p>Compared to full casters the access to higher level spells is clearly a comparative drawback, but compared to martial classes the ranger probably is the best controller with added benefits from fey wanderer.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>What is it that bards are really offering here? Both have expertise and fey wanderers add WIS + CHA bonuses to CHA checks. A bard might learn enhance ability but any ranger is guaranteed to be able to prep it on a short rest.</p><p></p><p>Either option taking expertise is at the cost expertise in a different skill.</p><p></p><p>Fey wanderers do make a good party face.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's one of the changes to 2024 rules. Paladins and rangers both change prepared spells the same way. One spell per long rest.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ashrym, post: 9519979, member: 6750235"] These questions don't seem relevant in the 2024 changes. Favored Enemy was updated to Hunter's Mark free uses and modifications. Favored terrain is now Expertise, Roving, and Tireless. Each of those is applicable everywhere. I think the important question is "Will I have fun?" The ranger was changed for Tasha's and changed again in the 2024 updates. I don't think that implies a resistance to change. I think demonstrates an inability to appease all ranger fans while remaining within WotC's goals. Players were asking for Hunter's Mark to be a class ability in 5e. Listening to players isn't solving perceived issues. Players seem to perceive more or different issues regardless when it come to implementing rangers. Changing rangers to a non-spellcasting class, for example, is likely going to cause some players to complain about the lack of magic and others to complain about balance between rangers, fighters, and rogues. It kind seems like lose-lose no matter what WotC does with the class at this point, unfortunately. Everyone is worse at skills compared to the rogue. Skill focused characters tend to be weaker than their counterparts though. Rogues are generally weaker than other martial classes. Bards are generally weaker than other major spellcasters. Rangers are the jack of all trades class and generally seen as weaker. I have mixed thoughts on this. Full casters are going to have similar issues. It's not like a glamour bard is going to be able to charm or frighten an immune target either. That's when it's time to break out a back up spell like entangle, ensnaring strike, or grasping vine; or an AoE like hail of thorns or conjure barrage. Compared to full casters the access to higher level spells is clearly a comparative drawback, but compared to martial classes the ranger probably is the best controller with added benefits from fey wanderer. What is it that bards are really offering here? Both have expertise and fey wanderers add WIS + CHA bonuses to CHA checks. A bard might learn enhance ability but any ranger is guaranteed to be able to prep it on a short rest. Either option taking expertise is at the cost expertise in a different skill. Fey wanderers do make a good party face. That's one of the changes to 2024 rules. Paladins and rangers both change prepared spells the same way. One spell per long rest. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Lackluster Ranger
Top