Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Ranes" data-source="post: 1841307" data-attributes="member: 4826">Uttering Draconic words and phrases doesn't make you fluent in Draconic, no. But someone who was fluent in Draconic would recognise verbal spell components, if we just say that these are spoken Draconic. Yet being fluent in Draconic isn't enough to grant a character a spellcraft check. Were it so, a fluent Draconic speaker would have a devastating counterspell ability. For verbal components to be Draconic, which I'd like them to be in my campaign, and for all the relevant parts of the core rules to still hang together, there must be something unfathomable about the arcane context of verbal components that only training in spellcraft explains. Thanks for your opinion. I want all the food for thought I can get.</blockquote>