Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The "Lawful" alignment, and why "Lawful Evil" is NOT an oxymoron!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pemerton" data-source="post: 6732525" data-attributes="member: 42582"><p>I think it's clear in the alignment section of Gygax's AD&D that law and chaos aren't independent values. They have only instrumental value. The LG value law and order because they think it is a means to universal welfare. The CG reject social structure and embrace freedom and individualism because they think that only the latter can lead to universal wellbeing.</p><p></p><p>The LE, NE and CE all pursue their own ends without regard to the wellbeing of others, but again they have different social theories. The LE think that the best way to impose their will is via some sort of collective structure. The CE think the best way to impose their will is through pursuing individual whim without any regard to cooperation or group effort. The NE are intermediate between these two.</p><p></p><p>I think other elements of AD&D, and even moreso post-Gygaxian D&D - and especially Planescape - have tried to make law and chaos into values of their own.</p><p></p><p>Here is a practical example to try to illustrate the difference: in the framework of the AD&D alignment sections, the LG person has as deep a disagreement with the LE person as with the CE person, perhaps even moreso, because they disagree radically over whether social structures are a source of welfare or just a yoke upon others.</p><p></p><p>Whereas once you hold law up as a distinct value, then the LG and LE person have some value in common. That's the thing that I think is incoherent.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pemerton, post: 6732525, member: 42582"] I think it's clear in the alignment section of Gygax's AD&D that law and chaos aren't independent values. They have only instrumental value. The LG value law and order because they think it is a means to universal welfare. The CG reject social structure and embrace freedom and individualism because they think that only the latter can lead to universal wellbeing. The LE, NE and CE all pursue their own ends without regard to the wellbeing of others, but again they have different social theories. The LE think that the best way to impose their will is via some sort of collective structure. The CE think the best way to impose their will is through pursuing individual whim without any regard to cooperation or group effort. The NE are intermediate between these two. I think other elements of AD&D, and even moreso post-Gygaxian D&D - and especially Planescape - have tried to make law and chaos into values of their own. Here is a practical example to try to illustrate the difference: in the framework of the AD&D alignment sections, the LG person has as deep a disagreement with the LE person as with the CE person, perhaps even moreso, because they disagree radically over whether social structures are a source of welfare or just a yoke upon others. Whereas once you hold law up as a distinct value, then the LG and LE person have some value in common. That's the thing that I think is incoherent. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The "Lawful" alignment, and why "Lawful Evil" is NOT an oxymoron!
Top