Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The "Lawful" alignment, and why "Lawful Evil" is NOT an oxymoron!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pemerton" data-source="post: 6732793" data-attributes="member: 42582"><p>Do you have the 1st ed AD&D books? By putting together the text from the PHB and DMG I think I've got something less impenetrable than Gygax's original!</p><p></p><p>I agree the first of the two paragraphs is basically nonsense. It is the second that I think conveys something about NE - like LE the NE is concerned with domination; like LE the NE believes that "good" (ie principled respect for and pursuit of the wellbeingof others) is just a charade for holding back the "deserving); but unlike the LE the NE don't believe that social order is the tool for imposing their yoke upon the world.</p><p></p><p>Sure, but then I don't think the AD&D alignments would be very helpful - at least, not the ones set out by Gygax in his PHB and DMG.</p><p></p><p>I think a lot of headaches come out of the view that the 9-point alignment system is a universal scheme for classification. Whereas, as actually presented by Gygax in those books, it focuses on a particular conflict: is it social order, or is it individual freedom and self-realisation, that is the path to universal wellbeing?</p><p></p><p>To give another example of an interesting conflict that Gygax's 9-point alignment doesn't help frame: rights vs welfare. Gygax treats these both as <em>good</em> without distinction, so his alignment labels don't capture that point of disagreement. If you wanted a campaign or a story that was (say) Bentham vs Rawls, you would need a different set of labels from the ones that Gygax provides.</p><p></p><p>I think that once you start (i) trying to apply alignment labels to organisations, rather than to individuals, and (ii) take the view that everyone who belongs to or serves that organisation is of that alignment, you are going beyond what alignment can usefully do.</p><p></p><p>In the Star Wars context, for instance, what makes all Imperial officers LE rather than LN? Where is the evidence that they scorn truth, beauty and human wellbeing? Where is the evidence that <em>they</em> are trying to impose <em>their</em> yoke upon the world? That might be true for some of them but the personalities and beliefs of most are just not explored in enough detail to tell one way or the other.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pemerton, post: 6732793, member: 42582"] Do you have the 1st ed AD&D books? By putting together the text from the PHB and DMG I think I've got something less impenetrable than Gygax's original! I agree the first of the two paragraphs is basically nonsense. It is the second that I think conveys something about NE - like LE the NE is concerned with domination; like LE the NE believes that "good" (ie principled respect for and pursuit of the wellbeingof others) is just a charade for holding back the "deserving); but unlike the LE the NE don't believe that social order is the tool for imposing their yoke upon the world. Sure, but then I don't think the AD&D alignments would be very helpful - at least, not the ones set out by Gygax in his PHB and DMG. I think a lot of headaches come out of the view that the 9-point alignment system is a universal scheme for classification. Whereas, as actually presented by Gygax in those books, it focuses on a particular conflict: is it social order, or is it individual freedom and self-realisation, that is the path to universal wellbeing? To give another example of an interesting conflict that Gygax's 9-point alignment doesn't help frame: rights vs welfare. Gygax treats these both as [I]good[/I] without distinction, so his alignment labels don't capture that point of disagreement. If you wanted a campaign or a story that was (say) Bentham vs Rawls, you would need a different set of labels from the ones that Gygax provides. I think that once you start (i) trying to apply alignment labels to organisations, rather than to individuals, and (ii) take the view that everyone who belongs to or serves that organisation is of that alignment, you are going beyond what alignment can usefully do. In the Star Wars context, for instance, what makes all Imperial officers LE rather than LN? Where is the evidence that they scorn truth, beauty and human wellbeing? Where is the evidence that [I]they[/I] are trying to impose [I]their[/I] yoke upon the world? That might be true for some of them but the personalities and beliefs of most are just not explored in enough detail to tell one way or the other. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The "Lawful" alignment, and why "Lawful Evil" is NOT an oxymoron!
Top