Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Sacrosanct" data-source="post: 6667853" data-attributes="member: 15700">Sorry again, but you don't get to decide how and when words mean different things from what was said.If you keep making the comment &quot;fighters are no good out of combat&quot; (like Tony has), you don't get to come back and say you meant something else.&nbsp; Especially since you keep saying &quot;fighters are no good out of combat&quot; in every discussion like this that comes up.What you're doing is arguing, &quot;Don't buy a Lexus, because those cars can't perform on the race track.&quot;&nbsp; And people responding, &quot;Yes they can.&nbsp; If you choose this option, they're just as fast and good on the track as an M5 or other similar car.&nbsp; Here is the proof and actual data that shows this.&quot;&nbsp; And your response to that is, &quot;We just agree to disagree.&nbsp; the Lexus is no good on the track.&quot;<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f635.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt="o_O" title="Er... what?&nbsp; &nbsp; o_O"&nbsp; data-smilie="12"data-shortname="o_O" />&nbsp; It's either the worst case of willful ignorance, or arguing just for the sake of arguing.&nbsp; You seem to think that your subjective opinion is fact, even in the face of hard data that directly counters it.&nbsp; I can repeat over and over that it never rains in Oregon, but that doesn't make it true, nor does it make it an opinion to be debated or &quot;agree to disagree&quot;.&nbsp; It's flat out false.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Sacrosanct, post: 6667853, member: 15700"] Sorry again, but you don't get to decide how and when words mean different things from what was said. If you keep making the comment "fighters are no good out of combat" (like Tony has), you don't get to come back and say you meant something else. Especially since you [b]keep saying[/b] "fighters are no good out of combat" in every discussion like this that comes up. What you're doing is arguing, "Don't buy a Lexus, because those cars can't perform on the race track." And people responding, "Yes they can. If you choose this option, they're just as fast and good on the track as an M5 or other similar car. Here is the proof and actual data that shows this." And your response to that is, "We just agree to disagree. the Lexus is no good on the track." o_O It's either the worst case of willful ignorance, or arguing just for the sake of arguing. You seem to think that your subjective opinion is fact, even in the face of hard data that directly counters it. I can repeat over and over that it never rains in Oregon, but that doesn't make it true, nor does it make it an opinion to be debated or "agree to disagree". It's flat out false. [/QUOTE]

Verification