Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Benjamin Olson" data-source="post: 9827224" data-attributes="member: 6988941">So the whole thing is a meditation on the concept that each individual "contains multitudes", both in the sense that people are more than what you expect (ie: the accountant protagonist is also a talented dancer, many of the other characters have additional unexpected facets) and in the very different sense that we all carry within us our memories of all the thousands of people we've met.Act III was the end of the world contained within Chuck's mind, as experienced by the versions of people who "live in his memories". Notice that the main character is a schoolteacher who seems to be the same age as when he was a teacher at Chuck's school in Act I, when Chuck actually knew him.I think the point of portraying Chuck's death as the destruction of a whole world was a) to emphasize significance of any single human life, b) to examine the way we all live in our own constructions of reality,, and c) to provide the flimmakers with the opportunity to satirize the gridlock, apathy, and indecision with which our real world has been dealing with various existential threats. The movie was clearly informed by pandemic experiences as well, though the short story it's based on predates that.I think it's a nice little movie, but I will say I feel like actually knowing the twist of Act III just being his mind kills the stakes of it, so I don't know how well it would hold up on repeat viewings. Also, because the source material is Stephen King, there is a (pretty unnecessary) supernatural element with a room predicting the future, which confusingly does not really have anything to do with the unusual opening of the movie.</blockquote>

Verification