Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The Limit of Challenge as Level Approaches Infiinity
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 5566529" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>One thing that has always intrigued me about D&D is that there are certain monsters which are a challenge at low levels, which very quickly cease to be a challenge so that within only a few levels they aren't even a nuisance and consume virtually no resources to overcome. But, other monsters - no more a challenge than there peers to a low level foe - manage to hang on as challenges even as the party grows in level so that you might find yourself fighting the same monsters under increasingly difficult circumstances for most of your career.</p><p></p><p>As a DM I find myself relying pretty heavily on these monsters.</p><p></p><p>I'm not talking about monsters that can simply be scaled up in power as any monster can be scaled up - which third edition showed explicitly and even 1st edition implied. I'm talking about monsters which while retaining the same stats remain an non-zero challenge over twelve or more levels and still might in numbers threaten even a powerful character. </p><p></p><p>I'm likewise not talking about Tucker's Kobolds or similar scenarios where the monster is merely the trigger for a sentient trap. Tucker's Kobolds typically involve the DM abusing the rules, bending the rules, preferentially ruling in favor of monsters in circumstances where things would never work if the PC's tried them, and simply by making the monsters stats irrelevant in the encounter. Obviously, the monster is irrelevant in the case and the real challenge is a combination the devious trap and getting the DM to admit that you killed his pet monsters.</p><p></p><p>For example, the zombie is not a monster of this sort. At low levels a gang of zombies might represent a considerable challenge to a group of players, but within only a few levels these lumbering, landbound, melee only, stupid, turnable creatures with low BAB and no special attacks are rendered irrelevant unless the DM turns the environment into a trap or advances the zombie to greater power - say an ogre zombie.</p><p></p><p>The same is true of most humanoid monsters that rely on weapons to attack. Gnolls in particular seem to gain and then lose their fearsomeness quickly. The same is also true of virtually all animals.</p><p></p><p>If we look at why this is true, certain traits stand out.</p><p></p><p>a) The monster lacks a counter to an ability which the PC's will have either shortly after the monster is encountered or even by the time the PC's encounter it. The most obvious example is Flight, which allows a party with this ability to gain an absolute advantage over landbound monsters without ranged attacks whenever it can be succesfully deployed. This forces the DM to only use such a monster in a carefully confined space, else it won't live up to its CR.</p><p>b) The monster has a low 'to hit' score not only absolutely but even for monsters of its class, usually as a result of roughly human strength, and no way of coping with high AC. AC has an interesting property. As your AC increases linearly, your expected damage decreases exponentionally. A monster that hits you 15% of the time, does only 1/3rd as much damage if your AC goes up by two. Monsters of this sort might be a threat at level 1, still a nuisance at level 3, only to cease to be a threat even in twenty or forty times their original number by level 5. Skeletons are monsters of this sort, as are most low HD humanoids with roughly human characteristics (including humans!). Such monsters only stay relevant by being granted massive advantages in terrain and tactical position, and refusing to give open battle. Orcs do slightly better with their high strength scores, but they two soon lose relevance. Meanwhile ogres with their high strength and reach might remain at least somewhat relavant for 6-8 levels after they are first encountered.</p><p>c) Not undead, or undead with signficant resistance to turning. Once a party has twice the HD of an undead creature, it's usually reduced to insignificance. Many low HD undead qualify, though minimal bolstering from the environment (unhallow for example) can usually deal with this problem without elaborate environment considerations.</p><p></p><p>Some monsters do exceptionally well and these are the ones which have what I call 'level independent abilities'. Some examples include:</p><p></p><p>a) Incorporeal: Incorporeal creatures ignore armor and have a 50% chance of ignoring most attacks. This makes it incredibly difficult to get sufficient AC to make their attacks irrelevant, and gives them protection that almost always negates at least some attacks regardless of how high your attack bonus is or how difficult your saving throws are.</p><p>b) Touch Attacks Generally: Any touch attack is good.</p><p>c) Breath Weapons: Most breath weapons are of the 'save or half damage' variaty, which means they typically remain relavant to all but Rogues regardless of how easy the saving throw is.</p><p>d) Certain spells: Spells that are 'save partial' usually have some effect regardless of how good the opponents saves are. Better yet, some spells like magic missile offer no save, and so are exceptionally difficult to defend against. A monster that has the ability to cast magic missile 3/day is relevant for three rounds almost regardless of the parties level.</p><p>e) At least minimal defensive suite: Monsters that have a combination of flight, ranged attacks, and the ability to detect invisible creatures are able to counter most of the battlefield control and evasion that a party might try. Additional abilities like spring attack, combat reflexes, relatively high attack bonus for its CR, DR/-, immunities, area attacks, improved grab, high movement rate, and some sort of battlefield control add to and enhance the minimum package or help compensate for some deficiency in it. These abilties are often found in anything intended to have high CR and well designed, but there presence in a low CR monster indicates a monster that has a real life expectancy.</p><p>f) Ability drain: Attacks that effect relatively static ability scores as opposed to hit points remain relevant for longer periods. </p><p></p><p>Some well known monsters that meet these standards in whole or in part are:</p><p></p><p>Shadow (without cleric) </p><p>Wraith (without cleric)</p><p>Dragon</p><p>Mephit</p><p>Hell Hound</p><p>Hellwasp Swarm (or swarms generally)</p><p>Stirge</p><p>Huge Air Elemental</p><p>Fire Giant </p><p></p><p>So, what about it? Have I missed any monsters under 12 CR whose abilities give them great endurance as a monster even as the party climbs in level, particularly those that might be hiding in obscure 3rd edition tomes? </p><p></p><p>What about earlier editions? I can make similar lists for 1st edition, but I'll leave that excercise to the interested reader for now.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 5566529, member: 4937"] One thing that has always intrigued me about D&D is that there are certain monsters which are a challenge at low levels, which very quickly cease to be a challenge so that within only a few levels they aren't even a nuisance and consume virtually no resources to overcome. But, other monsters - no more a challenge than there peers to a low level foe - manage to hang on as challenges even as the party grows in level so that you might find yourself fighting the same monsters under increasingly difficult circumstances for most of your career. As a DM I find myself relying pretty heavily on these monsters. I'm not talking about monsters that can simply be scaled up in power as any monster can be scaled up - which third edition showed explicitly and even 1st edition implied. I'm talking about monsters which while retaining the same stats remain an non-zero challenge over twelve or more levels and still might in numbers threaten even a powerful character. I'm likewise not talking about Tucker's Kobolds or similar scenarios where the monster is merely the trigger for a sentient trap. Tucker's Kobolds typically involve the DM abusing the rules, bending the rules, preferentially ruling in favor of monsters in circumstances where things would never work if the PC's tried them, and simply by making the monsters stats irrelevant in the encounter. Obviously, the monster is irrelevant in the case and the real challenge is a combination the devious trap and getting the DM to admit that you killed his pet monsters. For example, the zombie is not a monster of this sort. At low levels a gang of zombies might represent a considerable challenge to a group of players, but within only a few levels these lumbering, landbound, melee only, stupid, turnable creatures with low BAB and no special attacks are rendered irrelevant unless the DM turns the environment into a trap or advances the zombie to greater power - say an ogre zombie. The same is true of most humanoid monsters that rely on weapons to attack. Gnolls in particular seem to gain and then lose their fearsomeness quickly. The same is also true of virtually all animals. If we look at why this is true, certain traits stand out. a) The monster lacks a counter to an ability which the PC's will have either shortly after the monster is encountered or even by the time the PC's encounter it. The most obvious example is Flight, which allows a party with this ability to gain an absolute advantage over landbound monsters without ranged attacks whenever it can be succesfully deployed. This forces the DM to only use such a monster in a carefully confined space, else it won't live up to its CR. b) The monster has a low 'to hit' score not only absolutely but even for monsters of its class, usually as a result of roughly human strength, and no way of coping with high AC. AC has an interesting property. As your AC increases linearly, your expected damage decreases exponentionally. A monster that hits you 15% of the time, does only 1/3rd as much damage if your AC goes up by two. Monsters of this sort might be a threat at level 1, still a nuisance at level 3, only to cease to be a threat even in twenty or forty times their original number by level 5. Skeletons are monsters of this sort, as are most low HD humanoids with roughly human characteristics (including humans!). Such monsters only stay relevant by being granted massive advantages in terrain and tactical position, and refusing to give open battle. Orcs do slightly better with their high strength scores, but they two soon lose relevance. Meanwhile ogres with their high strength and reach might remain at least somewhat relavant for 6-8 levels after they are first encountered. c) Not undead, or undead with signficant resistance to turning. Once a party has twice the HD of an undead creature, it's usually reduced to insignificance. Many low HD undead qualify, though minimal bolstering from the environment (unhallow for example) can usually deal with this problem without elaborate environment considerations. Some monsters do exceptionally well and these are the ones which have what I call 'level independent abilities'. Some examples include: a) Incorporeal: Incorporeal creatures ignore armor and have a 50% chance of ignoring most attacks. This makes it incredibly difficult to get sufficient AC to make their attacks irrelevant, and gives them protection that almost always negates at least some attacks regardless of how high your attack bonus is or how difficult your saving throws are. b) Touch Attacks Generally: Any touch attack is good. c) Breath Weapons: Most breath weapons are of the 'save or half damage' variaty, which means they typically remain relavant to all but Rogues regardless of how easy the saving throw is. d) Certain spells: Spells that are 'save partial' usually have some effect regardless of how good the opponents saves are. Better yet, some spells like magic missile offer no save, and so are exceptionally difficult to defend against. A monster that has the ability to cast magic missile 3/day is relevant for three rounds almost regardless of the parties level. e) At least minimal defensive suite: Monsters that have a combination of flight, ranged attacks, and the ability to detect invisible creatures are able to counter most of the battlefield control and evasion that a party might try. Additional abilities like spring attack, combat reflexes, relatively high attack bonus for its CR, DR/-, immunities, area attacks, improved grab, high movement rate, and some sort of battlefield control add to and enhance the minimum package or help compensate for some deficiency in it. These abilties are often found in anything intended to have high CR and well designed, but there presence in a low CR monster indicates a monster that has a real life expectancy. f) Ability drain: Attacks that effect relatively static ability scores as opposed to hit points remain relevant for longer periods. Some well known monsters that meet these standards in whole or in part are: Shadow (without cleric) Wraith (without cleric) Dragon Mephit Hell Hound Hellwasp Swarm (or swarms generally) Stirge Huge Air Elemental Fire Giant So, what about it? Have I missed any monsters under 12 CR whose abilities give them great endurance as a monster even as the party climbs in level, particularly those that might be hiding in obscure 3rd edition tomes? What about earlier editions? I can make similar lists for 1st edition, but I'll leave that excercise to the interested reader for now. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The Limit of Challenge as Level Approaches Infiinity
Top