Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="jaelis" data-source="post: 7327597" data-attributes="member: 60210">Sure, and maybe you just think conjuration spells are awesome and that balances the subclass. I'm not really trying to say that conjurers suck. I'm trying to say that, with a conservative interpretation, minor conjuration sucks. I think that if it is reasonable to rule in a way to make abilities more usable, you should.Now, maybe you think that letting minor conjuration work for components is unbalancing and makes conjurers too good. If so, why? Essentially every game I've played, the component costs for a given level spell are fairly minor in comparison to the amount of treasure the party has accumulated. And if you play in a low treasure game, then it seems to me you are basically just banning those spells anyway (or, effectively making them higher level). If there are particular spells that you feel deserve that adjustment, why not just adjust them? And if not, then giving players a way to access them should be a plus.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="jaelis, post: 7327597, member: 60210"] Sure, and maybe you just think conjuration spells are awesome and that balances the subclass. I'm not really trying to say that conjurers suck. I'm trying to say that, with a conservative interpretation, minor conjuration sucks. I think that if it is reasonable to rule in a way to make abilities more usable, you should. Now, maybe you think that letting minor conjuration work for components is unbalancing and makes conjurers too good. If so, why? Essentially every game I've played, the component costs for a given level spell are fairly minor in comparison to the amount of treasure the party has accumulated. And if you play in a low treasure game, then it seems to me you are basically just banning those spells anyway (or, effectively making them higher level). If there are particular spells that you feel deserve that adjustment, why not just adjust them? And if not, then giving players a way to access them should be a plus. [/QUOTE]

Verification