Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
The Lord of the Rings as [Greenlandian] Fantasy in The Letters of J. R. R. Tolkien [edited title]
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hriston" data-source="post: 9431806" data-attributes="member: 6787503"><p>It's a bit more than a single sentence. If you include the footnote I quoted, it's three sentences. Also, I'm not sure why you say "could have". The statement takes it as given the setting <em>is</em> our world. He acknowledges the difficulty of making the story "fit" and that he "could have fitted things in with greater verisimilitude, if the story had not become too far developed, before the question ever occurred to me." The reason I've asked for passages is I find it difficult to engage with the unsupported assertions that have mainly been offered by those who've posted that the novel's setting couldn't be our world in the time-period discussed, and I disagree I've been provided with any. To date, I don't think anyone has provided any actual quotes from the books. If I've overlooked any, I'd be happy to engage with them.</p><p></p><p>My position isn't so much that the text shouldn't be taken literally. I mean, that's true of pretty much any text, and especially so when one considers the, albeit fictional, "translational" nature of the novel. I.e. it's clearly not a literal translation since it contains so much idiom. Since it's fiction, it's not meant to be taken as literal, i.e. factual. I think that's understood by most readers. But I think what you're responding to (which is unclear to me) is my statement that the drawing is not a faithful (i.e. literal) rendering of the interior of Bag End. Let me clarify my position on this. I think the words are meant to be taken literally. I.e. the reader is meant to imagine Bilbo as owning clocks, silver spoons, pocket handkerchiefs, umbrellas, etc. and Bag End as looking pretty much how it looks in the drawing which is perfectly compatible with its description in the book. However, given that these elements are primarily expressive of the 20th century West Midlands <em>character </em>that hobbits represent, I don't see them as particularly, or primarily, informative of <em>setting. </em>For elements that contribute to setting, I would look to the author's extensive use of geography and references to events in the distant past that give the novel a sense of time and place. I'd also look at the variety of cultures that are represented as a whole as something that informs the setting. Bag End and the Shire are, of course, <em>settings</em> of some parts of the novel's action, but they don't have a whole lot to say about the setting in its entirety.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hriston, post: 9431806, member: 6787503"] It's a bit more than a single sentence. If you include the footnote I quoted, it's three sentences. Also, I'm not sure why you say "could have". The statement takes it as given the setting [I]is[/I] our world. He acknowledges the difficulty of making the story "fit" and that he "could have fitted things in with greater verisimilitude, if the story had not become too far developed, before the question ever occurred to me." The reason I've asked for passages is I find it difficult to engage with the unsupported assertions that have mainly been offered by those who've posted that the novel's setting couldn't be our world in the time-period discussed, and I disagree I've been provided with any. To date, I don't think anyone has provided any actual quotes from the books. If I've overlooked any, I'd be happy to engage with them. My position isn't so much that the text shouldn't be taken literally. I mean, that's true of pretty much any text, and especially so when one considers the, albeit fictional, "translational" nature of the novel. I.e. it's clearly not a literal translation since it contains so much idiom. Since it's fiction, it's not meant to be taken as literal, i.e. factual. I think that's understood by most readers. But I think what you're responding to (which is unclear to me) is my statement that the drawing is not a faithful (i.e. literal) rendering of the interior of Bag End. Let me clarify my position on this. I think the words are meant to be taken literally. I.e. the reader is meant to imagine Bilbo as owning clocks, silver spoons, pocket handkerchiefs, umbrellas, etc. and Bag End as looking pretty much how it looks in the drawing which is perfectly compatible with its description in the book. However, given that these elements are primarily expressive of the 20th century West Midlands [I]character [/I]that hobbits represent, I don't see them as particularly, or primarily, informative of [I]setting. [/I]For elements that contribute to setting, I would look to the author's extensive use of geography and references to events in the distant past that give the novel a sense of time and place. I'd also look at the variety of cultures that are represented as a whole as something that informs the setting. Bag End and the Shire are, of course, [I]settings[/I] of some parts of the novel's action, but they don't have a whole lot to say about the setting in its entirety. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
The Lord of the Rings as [Greenlandian] Fantasy in The Letters of J. R. R. Tolkien [edited title]
Top