Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
The love/hate relationship for DM's.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kzach" data-source="post: 4465999" data-attributes="member: 56189"><p>I love 4e. It has its flaws, but for me it is the game system I've been wanting for twenty years. A big reason why I love it so much is that as a DM, I like to run games pretty much on the fly with only a general idea of what's going to happen and why and where. I like to give the players the cues to follow a plot, but ultimately they do it however they want and go wherever they want.</p><p></p><p>I think this is described as the sandbox method.</p><p></p><p>Whatever the case, I'm really finding 4e to be conducive to this kind of play-style and I'm getting really excited about running a full-blown campaign for the first time in a good ten years. I also love it as a player as I find it a lot of fun and far more engaging than previous editions.</p><p></p><p>So with that all said, I just now realised that the potential is there for me to really hate what players might pull out of their hats at higher levels. This came about as I was tinkering with a 12th-level character of mine and hit upon a very nasty set of actions that I could pull off.</p><p></p><p>I won't go into too much detail. Suffice to say that a brutal rogue shadow assassin (shadow assassin's riposte) with riposte strike, deadly positioning and trick strike could make life extremely painful for even a solo in a DM's campaign. That rogue would wanna have damn high defences 'cause after pulling off a stunt like this, I know I'd be (as the NPC, I don't take things personally in game, that's just silly) pissed off and targeting him with all I had <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></p><p></p><p>I'm thinking this is not the only possible combination of manoeuvres out there that are perfectly legal and, not really broken, just... freakin' uber!</p><p></p><p>Last session (with me as a player) we had a pretty awesome set of circumstances against the end boss. The end boss targeted me with an uber attack and the ranger used Disruptive Strike to thwart the attack. Then the DM used the NPC's action point and rolled the attack again, at which point I used Shield and thwarted another attack and made him waste an action point.</p><p></p><p>I thought that was very cool as a player. But as a DM, man that would've had me boiling <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kzach, post: 4465999, member: 56189"] I love 4e. It has its flaws, but for me it is the game system I've been wanting for twenty years. A big reason why I love it so much is that as a DM, I like to run games pretty much on the fly with only a general idea of what's going to happen and why and where. I like to give the players the cues to follow a plot, but ultimately they do it however they want and go wherever they want. I think this is described as the sandbox method. Whatever the case, I'm really finding 4e to be conducive to this kind of play-style and I'm getting really excited about running a full-blown campaign for the first time in a good ten years. I also love it as a player as I find it a lot of fun and far more engaging than previous editions. So with that all said, I just now realised that the potential is there for me to really hate what players might pull out of their hats at higher levels. This came about as I was tinkering with a 12th-level character of mine and hit upon a very nasty set of actions that I could pull off. I won't go into too much detail. Suffice to say that a brutal rogue shadow assassin (shadow assassin's riposte) with riposte strike, deadly positioning and trick strike could make life extremely painful for even a solo in a DM's campaign. That rogue would wanna have damn high defences 'cause after pulling off a stunt like this, I know I'd be (as the NPC, I don't take things personally in game, that's just silly) pissed off and targeting him with all I had :D I'm thinking this is not the only possible combination of manoeuvres out there that are perfectly legal and, not really broken, just... freakin' uber! Last session (with me as a player) we had a pretty awesome set of circumstances against the end boss. The end boss targeted me with an uber attack and the ranger used Disruptive Strike to thwart the attack. Then the DM used the NPC's action point and rolled the attack again, at which point I used Shield and thwarted another attack and made him waste an action point. I thought that was very cool as a player. But as a DM, man that would've had me boiling :D [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
The love/hate relationship for DM's.
Top