Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Magical Martial
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 9342171" data-attributes="member: 6801228"><p>I suppose giving Expertise or lowering the DC end up having about the same result mathematically. </p><p></p><p>The problem, as in a design puzzle sort of problem, is that if you offer expertise, it needs to be completely free-range. A fighter or other martial needs to be able to choose any skill to apply expertise too, from history to perception and stealth. Meanwhile, if this "physical ability" system is designed assuming that the fighter has expertise, then it ends up being either ignored or the only choice. </p><p></p><p>The thing is, doubling your lifting capacity or jumping distance is just not nearly as useful as stealth or perception, because using it effectively requires circumstances and clever play. Meanwhile everyone rolls stealth and perception checks consistently, even if they aren't built for them. I think even if you implement this system, you might still see a lot of people ignore it and put expertise into the more commonly useful skills. This is part of why I'm thinking of lowering the DCs. 15 isn't that much easier to hit if you are looking at normal ability score numbers, and the end result is till the high level PC hitting the number about 90% of the time (needing a 4 or better) </p><p></p><p>Looking over the rest of it, I'm struck that doubling movement speed for a check is very extreme. IT essentially allows for a free dash action. I do want melee fighters to be faster, but this might be too much. The other uses in jumping or lifting will likely take actions or bonus actions (jumping is tricky) but the movement speed increase would be useless if it did. IT might be better to have the first movement increase be by 1.5 then 2 then 2.5 or 15/30/45. This makes the top speed 75 or 150 with dash, but that is with a base of 30 ft. </p><p></p><p>I'm not against the more impressive top-speed, I'm more looking at the value of the dash action. It is already a very under-utilized action unless you can use it as a bonus action, and I'm worried that an easy doubling of movement speed would kill it entirely, except for those classes like the rogue or monk. Which, by the way, hit monumental speeds with even a bit of tweaking.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, you do need to remember that the "max lift" is the "pick it up, maybe stumble 5 ft with it" score, not the lift and carry score, which is generally half of the max. So, halving to ~2850, and I can see a 20th level Goliath Bear Totem Barbarian with 24 strength being capable of carrying a small car down the street.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I've honestly debated on that. What holds me back is, again, the fantasy. Orcs and Goliaths will both have powerful build, and both are classically picked by people who want to be "the strong guy" and I want people to feel like that is a legitimate choice since useful cases of strength are pretty rare compared to other scores. </p><p></p><p>I think I would be much more inclined to leave Powerful Build as race specific, but if someone was playing a human and truly wanted that extra capacity, I'd find a way for them to achieve it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Hmm, I did forget about them getting advantage from a subclass ability. That might change the math a bit.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chaosmancer, post: 9342171, member: 6801228"] I suppose giving Expertise or lowering the DC end up having about the same result mathematically. The problem, as in a design puzzle sort of problem, is that if you offer expertise, it needs to be completely free-range. A fighter or other martial needs to be able to choose any skill to apply expertise too, from history to perception and stealth. Meanwhile, if this "physical ability" system is designed assuming that the fighter has expertise, then it ends up being either ignored or the only choice. The thing is, doubling your lifting capacity or jumping distance is just not nearly as useful as stealth or perception, because using it effectively requires circumstances and clever play. Meanwhile everyone rolls stealth and perception checks consistently, even if they aren't built for them. I think even if you implement this system, you might still see a lot of people ignore it and put expertise into the more commonly useful skills. This is part of why I'm thinking of lowering the DCs. 15 isn't that much easier to hit if you are looking at normal ability score numbers, and the end result is till the high level PC hitting the number about 90% of the time (needing a 4 or better) Looking over the rest of it, I'm struck that doubling movement speed for a check is very extreme. IT essentially allows for a free dash action. I do want melee fighters to be faster, but this might be too much. The other uses in jumping or lifting will likely take actions or bonus actions (jumping is tricky) but the movement speed increase would be useless if it did. IT might be better to have the first movement increase be by 1.5 then 2 then 2.5 or 15/30/45. This makes the top speed 75 or 150 with dash, but that is with a base of 30 ft. I'm not against the more impressive top-speed, I'm more looking at the value of the dash action. It is already a very under-utilized action unless you can use it as a bonus action, and I'm worried that an easy doubling of movement speed would kill it entirely, except for those classes like the rogue or monk. Which, by the way, hit monumental speeds with even a bit of tweaking. Well, you do need to remember that the "max lift" is the "pick it up, maybe stumble 5 ft with it" score, not the lift and carry score, which is generally half of the max. So, halving to ~2850, and I can see a 20th level Goliath Bear Totem Barbarian with 24 strength being capable of carrying a small car down the street. I've honestly debated on that. What holds me back is, again, the fantasy. Orcs and Goliaths will both have powerful build, and both are classically picked by people who want to be "the strong guy" and I want people to feel like that is a legitimate choice since useful cases of strength are pretty rare compared to other scores. I think I would be much more inclined to leave Powerful Build as race specific, but if someone was playing a human and truly wanted that extra capacity, I'd find a way for them to achieve it. Hmm, I did forget about them getting advantage from a subclass ability. That might change the math a bit. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Magical Martial
Top