Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="dave2008" data-source="post: 7612127" data-attributes="member: 83242">I think that is too high standard.  Accuracy is nearly impossible in current religions, not to mention dead ones.  What is accurate to one practitioner of a faith and be false and blasphemy to another of the same faith.  Accuracy is in the I of the beholder.Again, I think accuracy, or complete accuracy, is to high a standard.  I would go for intent and inspiration.Also, I will clarify that the inaccuracies are your opinion, not fact.  Now, of course we have a lot more information than James had (despite the 5 years of research), and given how subjective myths, legends, and religions are - I would find it highly likely that a game supplement would have some inaccuracies.  To claim 100% accuracy is the place of faith and religion, not a RPG supplement.  So is the bible to Christians, that's why we got the D&D satanic scare in the US.  What is your point?Again that is to strict of a standard - someone is always sensitive when it comes to religion.  I personally don't find it sensitive to discuss religion, in fact I enjoy it.  So is it okay for me to make a RPG product that involves RW religions?Ugh, I am regretting this response.  I don't see continuing this conversation going well and I get the feeling that this subject is too sensitive for you.  Maybe you should take your own advice. I think it is perhaps the best approach in this context.  The internet is not the best conduit for sensitivity.</blockquote>

Verification