Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The "Mass" Spells
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jay Lofstead" data-source="post: 598063" data-attributes="member: 7199"><p>I have done some looking into this myself and did see a general pattern. It looks like a basic +3 levels with an adjustment by +/- 2 depending on the relative power of the adjustment (how does the effectiveness of the "mass" version compare to the base version).</p><p></p><p>Take Mass Teleport compared to Teleport. All it does is to double the weight that can be transported. As far as effectiveness goes, this is not as good as Mass Haste (which extends the number of creatures by your level).</p><p></p><p>If I were to make a "real" mass teleport, I'd want it to allow the touched creatures to teleport with the caster each using the minimal weight allowance for the teleport spell (with one target touched per caster level). This would be a +3 or +4 spell levels rather than just +2.</p><p></p><p>Mass Phantasmal Killer takes a single death effect and allows it to work against several members of a group (a LOT more effective). Making that one +5 makes sense.</p><p></p><p>Look at things from that angle and see where it gets you. I think you might agree. The confounding piece is that the mass versions are not all using the same relationship to their base counterparts and the effectiveness of the mass versions vary greatly compared to each other. It certainly isn't a fixed adjustment.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jay Lofstead, post: 598063, member: 7199"] I have done some looking into this myself and did see a general pattern. It looks like a basic +3 levels with an adjustment by +/- 2 depending on the relative power of the adjustment (how does the effectiveness of the "mass" version compare to the base version). Take Mass Teleport compared to Teleport. All it does is to double the weight that can be transported. As far as effectiveness goes, this is not as good as Mass Haste (which extends the number of creatures by your level). If I were to make a "real" mass teleport, I'd want it to allow the touched creatures to teleport with the caster each using the minimal weight allowance for the teleport spell (with one target touched per caster level). This would be a +3 or +4 spell levels rather than just +2. Mass Phantasmal Killer takes a single death effect and allows it to work against several members of a group (a LOT more effective). Making that one +5 makes sense. Look at things from that angle and see where it gets you. I think you might agree. The confounding piece is that the mass versions are not all using the same relationship to their base counterparts and the effectiveness of the mass versions vary greatly compared to each other. It certainly isn't a fixed adjustment. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The "Mass" Spells
Top