Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
The Mathematical Model of the d20 System
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Wulf Ratbane" data-source="post: 4198263" data-attributes="member: 94"><p>1) The ability for a PC to use 100% of his resources in a fight is unchanged from 4e to 3e.</p><p></p><p>2) The CR of a creature is not based on how many resources you have used, or have left. CR is a fixed value representing combat effectiveness/threat, and it assumes a fresh party. (If it didn't, it would be <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />ing useless.)</p><p></p><p>3) It is impossible (well, not impossible, but impractical) for a monster's <em>effectiveness</em> to double every 4 levels. However, in 4e, the <em>XP award</em> for a monster doubles every four levels. The <em>power curve</em> does not advance as fast as the <em>XP curve</em>. </p><p></p><p>4) Ergo, it is more efficient for the 4e party to fight above their level. They will earn XP faster than the threat increases. And it doesn't matter if they have to "go nova" to do this, because-- <em>just exactly as was true in 3e</em>-- there is no penalty for retiring for the day.</p><p></p><p>5) 4e does not contain any disincentive to abandon the 15-minute adventuring day.</p><p></p><p>Rather, it contains <em>incentives</em> to keep adventuring: Namely, your baseline "weakest state" is more powerful than it was in 3e. </p><p></p><p>However, the fact that a "depleted" 4e party <em>may</em> continue on at 75% of their optimal state does not mean that they <em>must</em> continue on at 75% of their optimal state. If they want to, they can <em>also</em> leave for the day.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>We're not discussing the benefits of going nova or not going nova. It's irrelevant to the fact that the XP curve advances faster than the difficulty curve, <em>except</em> to point out that if 4e characters want to expend 100% of their resources in every single fight, their ability to do so is no more curtailed than it was in 3e. (That is to say, the DM either allows them to get away with the 15 minute adventuring day, or he doesn't.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Wulf Ratbane, post: 4198263, member: 94"] 1) The ability for a PC to use 100% of his resources in a fight is unchanged from 4e to 3e. 2) The CR of a creature is not based on how many resources you have used, or have left. CR is a fixed value representing combat effectiveness/threat, and it assumes a fresh party. (If it didn't, it would be :):):):)ing useless.) 3) It is impossible (well, not impossible, but impractical) for a monster's [i]effectiveness[/i] to double every 4 levels. However, in 4e, the [i]XP award[/i] for a monster doubles every four levels. The [i]power curve[/i] does not advance as fast as the [i]XP curve[/i]. 4) Ergo, it is more efficient for the 4e party to fight above their level. They will earn XP faster than the threat increases. And it doesn't matter if they have to "go nova" to do this, because-- [i]just exactly as was true in 3e[/i]-- there is no penalty for retiring for the day. 5) 4e does not contain any disincentive to abandon the 15-minute adventuring day. Rather, it contains [i]incentives[/i] to keep adventuring: Namely, your baseline "weakest state" is more powerful than it was in 3e. However, the fact that a "depleted" 4e party [i]may[/i] continue on at 75% of their optimal state does not mean that they [i]must[/i] continue on at 75% of their optimal state. If they want to, they can [i]also[/i] leave for the day. We're not discussing the benefits of going nova or not going nova. It's irrelevant to the fact that the XP curve advances faster than the difficulty curve, [i]except[/i] to point out that if 4e characters want to expend 100% of their resources in every single fight, their ability to do so is no more curtailed than it was in 3e. (That is to say, the DM either allows them to get away with the 15 minute adventuring day, or he doesn't.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
The Mathematical Model of the d20 System
Top