Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Doctor Futurity" data-source="post: 7614660" data-attributes="member: 10738">There's nothing like sarcastic snark to quell the fire.&nbsp; I enjoyed 4E, for what it did well, and I get the idea of being pissed at people who couldn't just leave it alone, but I also realize that the game as it stands failed if it created this much overall discontent. And I'm speaking as someone who was Really Effin Pissed in 2010 when my cohort players decided they were tired of 4E and hated it. I do not have time to monologue about the entire sordid affair in some random blog post however, and originally only wanted to point out that the comment about 4E being alive and well today &quot;if only this or that&quot; might be a bit off. If 5E hadn't come around, we'd all be playing Pathfinder and wonder if WotC would ever get back in to publishing RPGs, maybe one called &quot;Magic&quot; to complement their only successful game line. YMMV and all that.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Doctor Futurity, post: 7614660, member: 10738"] There's nothing like sarcastic snark to quell the fire. I enjoyed 4E, for what it did well, and I get the idea of being pissed at people who couldn't just leave it alone, but I also realize that the game as it stands failed if it created this much overall discontent. And I'm speaking as someone who was Really Effin Pissed in 2010 when my cohort players decided they were tired of 4E and hated it. I do not have time to monologue about the entire sordid affair in some random blog post however, and originally only wanted to point out that the comment about 4E being alive and well today "if only this or that" might be a bit off. If 5E hadn't come around, we'd all be playing Pathfinder and wonder if WotC would ever get back in to publishing RPGs, maybe one called "Magic" to complement their only successful game line. YMMV and all that. [/QUOTE]

Verification