Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 6196094" data-attributes="member: 4937">It's not.&nbsp; But as I noted in an earlier post, I'm not a fan of the 'Druid' implementation either.&nbsp; I would prefer not to have an Ainu Shaman or a Vodoo Witch Doctor or any other animist priest concept statted as a 'Druid'.&nbsp;&nbsp; Likewise, I would prefer not to need a separate base class for Celtic Druids, Ainu Shamans, Vodoo Witch Doctors, Greek Witches, Finnish Bards, North American Shamans, or anything remotely inspired by any sort of animist priest or magic user or any similar such thing.&nbsp; I would prefer instead to have a flexible and powerful base class from which, if you wanted, you could make a 'Druidic' character but wouldn't constrain you from making anything else you could imagine either from fiction or within the conceit of the particular setting.&nbsp; In short, the Druid has many of the same problems as the 'Monk' and for many of the same reasons.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 6196094, member: 4937"] It's not. But as I noted in an earlier post, I'm not a fan of the 'Druid' implementation either. I would prefer not to have an Ainu Shaman or a Vodoo Witch Doctor or any other animist priest concept statted as a 'Druid'. Likewise, I would prefer not to need a separate base class for Celtic Druids, Ainu Shamans, Vodoo Witch Doctors, Greek Witches, Finnish Bards, North American Shamans, or anything remotely inspired by any sort of animist priest or magic user or any similar such thing. I would prefer instead to have a flexible and powerful base class from which, if you wanted, you could make a 'Druidic' character but wouldn't constrain you from making anything else you could imagine either from fiction or within the conceit of the particular setting. In short, the Druid has many of the same problems as the 'Monk' and for many of the same reasons. [/QUOTE]

Verification