Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The Monster Code
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rob626" data-source="post: 4142486" data-attributes="member: 58916"><p><strong>No! Bad Dm's! No Rules! Bad!</strong></p><p></p><p>I think the focus on the underlying math and the way of retro-engineering monsters is the wrong kind of "think". Specifically, one of the main things I am looking forward to in the new edition is being able to look at a bunch of critters of an approximate power level and then intuit a new monster based on a gestalt of the others.</p><p></p><p>"Hmmm...these roles at this power level give around this many hp, attack, and defense bonuses. Now let's add in a funky power or two on par with these others or just swipe a power from this other critter. Figure out why he's there and what he's doing. Done."</p><p></p><p>As opposed to "Ok, now I take this concrete number and crunch it against this and we have exactly 7.5 hp per whatever with a static bonus of 4.3 per whatever. Now let's add in this other variable and tweak the whole thing yet again. Almost there. Next we add this template. Just a minute. Be right there. Advance the hit dice. Carry the 2."</p><p></p><p>The second example is specifically what the designers are moving AWAY from. They don't intend for creature creation to be 3.x anymore and I couldn't be happier. General guides based on their hard work is good enough for me. I don't WANT specifics because then my whiny players will expect me to USE specifics. </p><p></p><p>Ballparking not only keeps down the prep time but increases player suspense. Players should not be retro-engineering critters in the middle of a fight to determine strategy. And yes, I DO have players that do that, despite my best efforts to avoid it.</p><p></p><p>Keeping it loose allows more flexibility in the encounters. Players tearing through the critters too fast? Add a "when bloodied" nastiness on the fly. Players getting trounced? Reduce the critter's hp or defense a touch.</p><p></p><p>And the players never have to know. All they see is "Wow. I didn't think we would pull through" or "Jeez. That was tougher than I thought it would be." Not all the time, but enough to keep the suspense.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rob626, post: 4142486, member: 58916"] [b]No! Bad Dm's! No Rules! Bad![/b] I think the focus on the underlying math and the way of retro-engineering monsters is the wrong kind of "think". Specifically, one of the main things I am looking forward to in the new edition is being able to look at a bunch of critters of an approximate power level and then intuit a new monster based on a gestalt of the others. "Hmmm...these roles at this power level give around this many hp, attack, and defense bonuses. Now let's add in a funky power or two on par with these others or just swipe a power from this other critter. Figure out why he's there and what he's doing. Done." As opposed to "Ok, now I take this concrete number and crunch it against this and we have exactly 7.5 hp per whatever with a static bonus of 4.3 per whatever. Now let's add in this other variable and tweak the whole thing yet again. Almost there. Next we add this template. Just a minute. Be right there. Advance the hit dice. Carry the 2." The second example is specifically what the designers are moving AWAY from. They don't intend for creature creation to be 3.x anymore and I couldn't be happier. General guides based on their hard work is good enough for me. I don't WANT specifics because then my whiny players will expect me to USE specifics. Ballparking not only keeps down the prep time but increases player suspense. Players should not be retro-engineering critters in the middle of a fight to determine strategy. And yes, I DO have players that do that, despite my best efforts to avoid it. Keeping it loose allows more flexibility in the encounters. Players tearing through the critters too fast? Add a "when bloodied" nastiness on the fly. Players getting trounced? Reduce the critter's hp or defense a touch. And the players never have to know. All they see is "Wow. I didn't think we would pull through" or "Jeez. That was tougher than I thought it would be." Not all the time, but enough to keep the suspense. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The Monster Code
Top