Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mouseferatu" data-source="post: 3636288" data-attributes="member: 1288">I should be careful speaking for Felon, since he and I disagree about as often as we agree... <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />But I don't think he's saying &quot;WotC shouldn't publish new angels or new yugoloths.&quot; I think what he's saying--and if I'm interpreting correctly, I happen to agree with him 100%--that WotC shouldn't publish more of them purely for the sake of &quot;evening out&quot; the numbers. If/when the writers and developers have solid ideas for an angel or a yugoloth, by all means, include 'em in the next supplement. But to make an effort to fill pages with them based on some nonsensical idea of &quot;symmetry&quot; is a fool's errand.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mouseferatu, post: 3636288, member: 1288"] I should be careful speaking for Felon, since he and I disagree about as often as we agree... ;) But I don't think he's saying "WotC shouldn't publish new angels or new yugoloths." I think what he's saying--and if I'm interpreting correctly, I happen to agree with him 100%--that WotC shouldn't publish more of them [i]purely for the sake of "evening out" the numbers[/i]. If/when the writers and developers have solid ideas for an angel or a yugoloth, by all means, include 'em in the next supplement. But to make an effort to fill pages with them based on some nonsensical idea of "symmetry" is a fool's errand. [/QUOTE]

Verification