Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Monsters Know What They're Doing ... Are Unsure on 5e24
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tetrasodium" data-source="post: 9828170" data-attributes="member: 93670"><p>No, the statement you are <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f644.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll eyes :rolleyes:" data-smilie="11"data-shortname=":rolleyes:" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f644.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll eyes :rolleyes:" data-smilie="11"data-shortname=":rolleyes:" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f644.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll eyes :rolleyes:" data-smilie="11"data-shortname=":rolleyes:" />'ing at is often linked to problems caused by a topic that came up earlier in the thread.</p><p>[spoiler="this one"]</p><p></p><p>[/spoiler]</p><p>Even if you assume that first type of player simply for purposes of discussion, a statement like the "can I play a tortle" one I was responding to can have any claims of roleplaying reasons flatly dismissed on an objective level & I'll go deeper on why it can be done on an objective level no matter how in depth & detailed their unshared backstory personality & so on is.</p><p></p><p>There is a <strong>Core Problem</strong> with a statement like "can I play a tortle [in a 5e game]" & I bolded that because it's going to get referenced a few times It used to be that extreme character optimization was limited by outwardly visible character sheet entries & silo'd prior to 5e streamlining & simplifying away mechanical elements that served to place any form of hurdle in the way of the most extreme character optimization it took care and planning to make a statblock spreadsheet build of a PC where any narrative elements largely only exist to justify choices used to fill in the spreadsheet statblock rather than something that could be done with no preplanning & no outward headscratching worthy signs on the character sheet. Those hurdles were things like dual/hybrid classing systems that carry an opportunity cost locking a PC into the weight of locking in their later choice & prerequisites that lead to proactive questions about maxed cross class ranks in underwater basket weaving when that's normally a sign of a particular feat chain or PrC combo that seems oddly conflicted with any narrative claims. Without those signs & lock ins it becomes the logical inference to assume mere character optimization when it looks like that and the player has not bothered to share any hint of roleplaying with the table even if the player is in that first group simply because it is only novel writing or similar if there is not any hints of roleplaying occurring at the table. We could be generous & assume the hypothetical player asking for it is from the second group, but all we have is the Core Problem at this point so it's not reasonable to consider it a roleplaying choice until presented with some statement or action from the player that hints otherwise.</p><p></p><p> I'm not familiar with the site/blog, but I found <a href="https://rolldark.co.uk/the-blog/characterdepth" target="_blank">this</a> great article through google looking for a good solid definition of <a href="https://www.google.com/search?q=d%26d+spreadsheet+builds+slang&sca_esv=9eb2221ffd9d72e3&sxsrf=AE3TifNNugavnjUBKEV_ScZnunOYMDGL5Q%3A1767118693447&ei=ZRdUaYmIG76IwbkPk5Ub&ved=0ahUKEwjJzv6P9uWRAxU-RDABHZPKBgAQ4dUDCBE&uact=5&oq=d%26d+spreadsheet+builds+slang&gs_lp=Egxnd3Mtd2l6LXNlcnAiHGQmZCBzcHJlYWRzaGVldCBidWlsZHMgc2xhbmcyBRAhGKABMgUQIRigATIFECEYoAFIxhhQ8gVYyRRwAXgBkAEAmAGGAaABvAWqAQMwLja4AQPIAQD4AQGYAgegAs4FwgIKEAAYsAMY1gQYR8ICBRAhGKsCmAMAiAYBkAYIkgcDMS42oAeEH7IHAzAuNrgHywXCBwMwLjfIBwmACAA&sclient=gws-wiz-serp" target="_blank">spreadsheet builds</a>.</p><p></p><p>The original "can I play a tortle" is 100% a statement focused on stats and optimization. If anything my mention of a past player of mine who added "who is from Droaam" is the only element other than a question of pure stats.</p><p></p><p>Once again "can I play a tortle" lacks even a single word to suggest any sort of "concept" so it falls back to the Core Problem.</p><p></p><p>Once again, the Core problem exists simply because regardless of if the player is the first or second type of player "can I play a tortle" does not share any hint of this with others</p><p></p><p>Ditto</p><p></p><p>Once again, nothing but the Core Problem</p><p></p><p>and again</p><p></p><p>Still nothing from the player on this with a statement like "can I play a tortle"</p><p></p><p>They probably don't have any chance or reason to be acting at this point if they are simply asking "can I play a tortle", but they aren't doing anything else either & we get stuck on the Core Problem again.</p><p></p><p>If you feel like I've unreasonably overlooked some sign of roleplaying found in a statement like "can I play a tortle" I'd be fascinated to hear more</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tetrasodium, post: 9828170, member: 93670"] No, the statement you are :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:'ing at is often linked to problems caused by a topic that came up earlier in the thread. [spoiler="this one"] [/spoiler] Even if you assume that first type of player simply for purposes of discussion, a statement like the "can I play a tortle" one I was responding to can have any claims of roleplaying reasons flatly dismissed on an objective level & I'll go deeper on why it can be done on an objective level no matter how in depth & detailed their unshared backstory personality & so on is. There is a [B]Core Problem[/B] with a statement like "can I play a tortle [in a 5e game]" & I bolded that because it's going to get referenced a few times It used to be that extreme character optimization was limited by outwardly visible character sheet entries & silo'd prior to 5e streamlining & simplifying away mechanical elements that served to place any form of hurdle in the way of the most extreme character optimization it took care and planning to make a statblock spreadsheet build of a PC where any narrative elements largely only exist to justify choices used to fill in the spreadsheet statblock rather than something that could be done with no preplanning & no outward headscratching worthy signs on the character sheet. Those hurdles were things like dual/hybrid classing systems that carry an opportunity cost locking a PC into the weight of locking in their later choice & prerequisites that lead to proactive questions about maxed cross class ranks in underwater basket weaving when that's normally a sign of a particular feat chain or PrC combo that seems oddly conflicted with any narrative claims. Without those signs & lock ins it becomes the logical inference to assume mere character optimization when it looks like that and the player has not bothered to share any hint of roleplaying with the table even if the player is in that first group simply because it is only novel writing or similar if there is not any hints of roleplaying occurring at the table. We could be generous & assume the hypothetical player asking for it is from the second group, but all we have is the Core Problem at this point so it's not reasonable to consider it a roleplaying choice until presented with some statement or action from the player that hints otherwise. I'm not familiar with the site/blog, but I found [URL='https://rolldark.co.uk/the-blog/characterdepth']this[/URL] great article through google looking for a good solid definition of [URL='https://www.google.com/search?q=d%26d+spreadsheet+builds+slang&sca_esv=9eb2221ffd9d72e3&sxsrf=AE3TifNNugavnjUBKEV_ScZnunOYMDGL5Q%3A1767118693447&ei=ZRdUaYmIG76IwbkPk5Ub&ved=0ahUKEwjJzv6P9uWRAxU-RDABHZPKBgAQ4dUDCBE&uact=5&oq=d%26d+spreadsheet+builds+slang&gs_lp=Egxnd3Mtd2l6LXNlcnAiHGQmZCBzcHJlYWRzaGVldCBidWlsZHMgc2xhbmcyBRAhGKABMgUQIRigATIFECEYoAFIxhhQ8gVYyRRwAXgBkAEAmAGGAaABvAWqAQMwLja4AQPIAQD4AQGYAgegAs4FwgIKEAAYsAMY1gQYR8ICBRAhGKsCmAMAiAYBkAYIkgcDMS42oAeEH7IHAzAuNrgHywXCBwMwLjfIBwmACAA&sclient=gws-wiz-serp']spreadsheet builds[/URL]. The original "can I play a tortle" is 100% a statement focused on stats and optimization. If anything my mention of a past player of mine who added "who is from Droaam" is the only element other than a question of pure stats. Once again "can I play a tortle" lacks even a single word to suggest any sort of "concept" so it falls back to the Core Problem. Once again, the Core problem exists simply because regardless of if the player is the first or second type of player "can I play a tortle" does not share any hint of this with others Ditto Once again, nothing but the Core Problem and again Still nothing from the player on this with a statement like "can I play a tortle" They probably don't have any chance or reason to be acting at this point if they are simply asking "can I play a tortle", but they aren't doing anything else either & we get stuck on the Core Problem again. If you feel like I've unreasonably overlooked some sign of roleplaying found in a statement like "can I play a tortle" I'd be fascinated to hear more [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Monsters Know What They're Doing ... Are Unsure on 5e24
Top