Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Monsters Know What They're Doing ... Are Unsure on 5e24
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="EzekielRaiden" data-source="post: 9828485" data-attributes="member: 6790260"><p>I mean I have seen multiple people on this very forum take the former stance. And I have been personally painted with that very specific brush you describe in your final sentence here. So...if you want to complain about catastrophizing, it would help if there were fewer people <em>actually taking</em> the stance that "rules have to be written assuming every player is a bad person and every GM is faultless." Because I have been told that. More than once. By people, not just on this forum or subforum, but people who are posting in this <em>thread</em>.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I would love nothing more than this. I have consistently--in every single thread that has touched on this subject--spoken of consensus-building, of seeking common ground, of how it is <em>so unbelievably rare</em> to find an issue that truly cannot ever be resolved by talking it out, <em>unless</em> one or more people involved are participating in bad faith. I have said this many, many times.</p><p></p><p>If what you want is me to agree with "consensus-building is almost always possible and most reasonable, good-faith participants can work something out", then you have it. Hands down, no question. That's been my position for literal years. It's a position which gets <em>nothing but pushback</em> from the people you claim are so willing to get along. I don't know what to say about that, other than that those people have point-blank told me they reject your position, while I embrace it, wholeheartedly.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Perhaps so. Until I stop seeing GMs of 5e--an edition which vastly superpowers the GM and gives the players damn near nothing, the new 5.5e "we're all here to have fun" disclaimer aside--<em>constantly</em> complaining about "player entitlement", I'm not going to hold my breath.</p><p></p><p>Entitled players exist. It'd be nice if GMs around here also recognized that a hell of a lot of entitled <strong>GMs</strong> exist, too. I've never seen it. Not once. It's <em>always</em> the players who are at fault for poisoning the faultless GM's perfect vision.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Then, were it not a sin, I would envy you. My experiences with 5e have been, to say the least, <em>very bad</em> outside of my current two groups. My experiences of nearly every GM who toots the "GM empowerment" horn, and actually every GM who whines about "player entitlement", have been equally bad.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="EzekielRaiden, post: 9828485, member: 6790260"] I mean I have seen multiple people on this very forum take the former stance. And I have been personally painted with that very specific brush you describe in your final sentence here. So...if you want to complain about catastrophizing, it would help if there were fewer people [I]actually taking[/I] the stance that "rules have to be written assuming every player is a bad person and every GM is faultless." Because I have been told that. More than once. By people, not just on this forum or subforum, but people who are posting in this [I]thread[/I]. I would love nothing more than this. I have consistently--in every single thread that has touched on this subject--spoken of consensus-building, of seeking common ground, of how it is [I]so unbelievably rare[/I] to find an issue that truly cannot ever be resolved by talking it out, [I]unless[/I] one or more people involved are participating in bad faith. I have said this many, many times. If what you want is me to agree with "consensus-building is almost always possible and most reasonable, good-faith participants can work something out", then you have it. Hands down, no question. That's been my position for literal years. It's a position which gets [I]nothing but pushback[/I] from the people you claim are so willing to get along. I don't know what to say about that, other than that those people have point-blank told me they reject your position, while I embrace it, wholeheartedly. Perhaps so. Until I stop seeing GMs of 5e--an edition which vastly superpowers the GM and gives the players damn near nothing, the new 5.5e "we're all here to have fun" disclaimer aside--[I]constantly[/I] complaining about "player entitlement", I'm not going to hold my breath. Entitled players exist. It'd be nice if GMs around here also recognized that a hell of a lot of entitled [B]GMs[/B] exist, too. I've never seen it. Not once. It's [I]always[/I] the players who are at fault for poisoning the faultless GM's perfect vision. Then, were it not a sin, I would envy you. My experiences with 5e have been, to say the least, [I]very bad[/I] outside of my current two groups. My experiences of nearly every GM who toots the "GM empowerment" horn, and actually every GM who whines about "player entitlement", have been equally bad. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Monsters Know What They're Doing ... Are Unsure on 5e24
Top