Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Monsters Know What They're Doing ... Are Unsure on 5e24
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tetrasodium" data-source="post: 9828818" data-attributes="member: 93670"><p>[USER=6906980]@AlViking[/USER] wrt your 1127 reply, I should have taken the time to find & link to the post so I could have been more clear, I'm literally the person who brought it up back in <a href="https://www.enworld.org/threads/the-monsters-know-what-theyre-doing-are-unsure-on-5e24.716720/post-9827081" target="_blank">777</a> while talking about an actual gm<>player interaction of mine from years ago. The question was more why those sort of suggestions seem to come exclusively from posters saying players should be expected to actively work with the gm and adapt their character to fit the campaign/setting while the other side of the discussion only brings up new trivially resolved scenarios that only require the player to work with the gm to adapt the character to the campaign/setting.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You've endlessly advocated for players and shifted responsibility to the gm without limit throughout this thread... I'm not aware of it. Is there some inverted version of stormwind that I should be following as a GM where literally anything at all must be assumed to be roleplaying deserving of endlessly being cut some slack instead of Stormwind's idea that roleplaying and optimization are mutually exclusive?</p><p></p><p>?Going beyond the one AlViking brought up in <a href="https://www.enworld.org/threads/the-monsters-know-what-theyre-doing-are-unsure-on-5e24.716720/post-9828652" target="_blank">1103</a>, I'd like to introduce a new question for you or any of the folks outraged that a gm might be expected to walk or actively take steps to fit their character to the setting/campaign to answer.</p><p></p><p>Why is the gm expected to automatically assume that a question like "<a href="https://www.enworld.org/threads/the-monsters-know-what-theyre-doing-are-unsure-on-5e24.716720/post-9827897" target="_blank">Could I play a Dragonborn, Goliath, or Tortle?</a>" Is carrying some deep unexpressed roleplaying chops beneath a statement or question that couldn't bother to even hint at it and then endlessly grill the player for a seed like being smitten by a character from kung fu panda; but the gm can not expect the player to be proactive in voicing anything beyond pure mechanical "<em>Could I play a Dragonborn, Goliath, or Tortle</em>?"</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tetrasodium, post: 9828818, member: 93670"] [USER=6906980]@AlViking[/USER] wrt your 1127 reply, I should have taken the time to find & link to the post so I could have been more clear, I'm literally the person who brought it up back in [URL='https://www.enworld.org/threads/the-monsters-know-what-theyre-doing-are-unsure-on-5e24.716720/post-9827081']777[/URL] while talking about an actual gm<>player interaction of mine from years ago. The question was more why those sort of suggestions seem to come exclusively from posters saying players should be expected to actively work with the gm and adapt their character to fit the campaign/setting while the other side of the discussion only brings up new trivially resolved scenarios that only require the player to work with the gm to adapt the character to the campaign/setting. You've endlessly advocated for players and shifted responsibility to the gm without limit throughout this thread... I'm not aware of it. Is there some inverted version of stormwind that I should be following as a GM where literally anything at all must be assumed to be roleplaying deserving of endlessly being cut some slack instead of Stormwind's idea that roleplaying and optimization are mutually exclusive? ?Going beyond the one AlViking brought up in [URL='https://www.enworld.org/threads/the-monsters-know-what-theyre-doing-are-unsure-on-5e24.716720/post-9828652']1103[/URL], I'd like to introduce a new question for you or any of the folks outraged that a gm might be expected to walk or actively take steps to fit their character to the setting/campaign to answer. Why is the gm expected to automatically assume that a question like "[URL='https://www.enworld.org/threads/the-monsters-know-what-theyre-doing-are-unsure-on-5e24.716720/post-9827897']Could I play a Dragonborn, Goliath, or Tortle?[/URL]" Is carrying some deep unexpressed roleplaying chops beneath a statement or question that couldn't bother to even hint at it and then endlessly grill the player for a seed like being smitten by a character from kung fu panda; but the gm can not expect the player to be proactive in voicing anything beyond pure mechanical "[I]Could I play a Dragonborn, Goliath, or Tortle[/I]?" [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Monsters Know What They're Doing ... Are Unsure on 5e24
Top