Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Ferrix" data-source="post: 1897912" data-attributes="member: 6115">Go with AMG's recommendation.To fix what is often classified as "broken" really just takes a five minute appraisal by the DM on the spot or during the situation where it comes out that it's going to be a problem.  Also check errata, but don't just take it at face value and call it final.  Sometimes errata can adjust occasional problems into things that no one would want to take.In my opinion, nothing in any of those listed books is "broken" if taken with a grain of common sense, some of it is more powerful, and some of it is subpar.Out of the stuff other people have mentioned, I actually disagree with about 90% of it.  Sure there are a few things you have to be careful of (shapechanging magic/powers are easier case-by-case), but really in the right vein of things very little of it requires a unequivocal "no".For example:The Radiant Servant of Pelor could be quite powerful in a game where you'll be facing undead very frequently.  However, in a game where undead are less common, one of the PrC's main focuses (greater turning) becomes far less useable if you rarely encounter undead.  Also, depending upon your reading, the healing abilities could apply only to healing spells which are in the characters single domain slot.</blockquote>