Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="doctorbadwolf" data-source="post: 8041535" data-attributes="member: 6704184">Again, I completely disagree. The Barbarian should always have been primal, and was only not primal because of how magic worked in prior editions.The concept is directly and unequivocally part of what “primal” is in the 4e description. It would have been incredibly wierd to make it martial. Even weirder than it was to have the ranger be martial.The fact that it’s daily powers (and many utility powers, but okay) were the main primal magic of the class is an odd point to make when...the class is totally defined by its daily powers. Like...it’s daily powers are it’s rages, and are designed to define how the character fights in most battles during a day.</blockquote>