Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Multiverse is back....
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nivenus" data-source="post: 6394144" data-attributes="member: 71756"><p>Except using the same name <em>does</em> confuse things (I'm not sure why you'd claim otherwise). It means that if you use pre-4e archons you've got to rename them... or go the extra mile to explain, yes, these are archons but they're not the <em>same </em>archons. In fact, they're nothing like those other archons who happen to share the same name. Don't worry. It makes sense.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Except that's a major simplification of 4e eladrin vs. pre-4e eladrin. One's a celestial race with intrinsic dies to chaotic good deities. One's high elves with some extra magic. And that's not an exaggeration - in the Forgotten Realms 4e eladrin <em>are </em>moon elves and sun elves... <em>and </em>celestial eladrin (who were apparently the same race all along, but no one knew).</p><p></p><p>I'm not comfortable with the word "disrespect" in this context, but it certainly is more than just a representation of the same material. There were some major rewrites of the lore going on and it wasn't just Planescape fans who were disgruntled by it. The FR Wiki (which I started editing around 4e's release) damn well considered ignoring the entire edition. We're <em>still </em>dealing with repercussions now <em>six years later</em>, including an editionless policy that makes some of our articles a nigh incomprehensible mess. Even the Eberron Wiki, on my last check, is remarkably shy of 4e material, despite the minimal impact 4e had on that setting.</p><p></p><p>I think what you - and some other posters - are perceiving as "Planescape fans demanding special treatment for their lore" is actually a much wider phenomenon: which is that fans of published campaign settings don't like to see the boat rocked very much, if at all. Planescape fans don't like it, Realms fans don't like it, Greyhawk fans don't like it, Eberron fans don't like it, etc. It's not a Planescape thing. It's a setting fan thing. The only reason it looks like a Planescape thing is because we're talking specifically about the planes.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nivenus, post: 6394144, member: 71756"] Except using the same name [I]does[/I] confuse things (I'm not sure why you'd claim otherwise). It means that if you use pre-4e archons you've got to rename them... or go the extra mile to explain, yes, these are archons but they're not the [I]same [/I]archons. In fact, they're nothing like those other archons who happen to share the same name. Don't worry. It makes sense. Except that's a major simplification of 4e eladrin vs. pre-4e eladrin. One's a celestial race with intrinsic dies to chaotic good deities. One's high elves with some extra magic. And that's not an exaggeration - in the Forgotten Realms 4e eladrin [I]are [/I]moon elves and sun elves... [I]and [/I]celestial eladrin (who were apparently the same race all along, but no one knew). I'm not comfortable with the word "disrespect" in this context, but it certainly is more than just a representation of the same material. There were some major rewrites of the lore going on and it wasn't just Planescape fans who were disgruntled by it. The FR Wiki (which I started editing around 4e's release) damn well considered ignoring the entire edition. We're [I]still [/I]dealing with repercussions now [I]six years later[/I], including an editionless policy that makes some of our articles a nigh incomprehensible mess. Even the Eberron Wiki, on my last check, is remarkably shy of 4e material, despite the minimal impact 4e had on that setting. I think what you - and some other posters - are perceiving as "Planescape fans demanding special treatment for their lore" is actually a much wider phenomenon: which is that fans of published campaign settings don't like to see the boat rocked very much, if at all. Planescape fans don't like it, Realms fans don't like it, Greyhawk fans don't like it, Eberron fans don't like it, etc. It's not a Planescape thing. It's a setting fan thing. The only reason it looks like a Planescape thing is because we're talking specifically about the planes. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Multiverse is back....
Top